![]() |
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewith other.
"gravity" wrote in
reenews.net: How many times, say during Katrina did this occour uh, if you are deserted on an island with a few buckets of electronics junk, your best bet is CW. if you a prisoner of war, CW could be invaluable in getting a message out. there are many other cases where CW can be used in channels that don't support audio. i am a superior creature because i know CW! ;-) Gravity I feel I'm a better radio amateur for knowing and being able use CW, but I don't feel superior. When hardware fails, my pencil and paper still work. sc |
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewith other.
Cecil Moore wrote in
. net: Slow Code wrote: When hardware fails, my pencil and paper still work. When hardware fails, you resort to messages in bottles? Yes, I can get the message there quicker in a bottle, than the time it takes an appliance operator to get their rig back from a repair shop. SC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com