CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and your
text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry


ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC

CW is Laziness
 

Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:




ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.
insisting on foucing on the stupid stuff shows you lack a real argument

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.
nope tried that just gave me headaches

SC

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and your
text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry

Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC

I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and
your text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry

Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages
him to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him
instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC

I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?


Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.

SC

I don't think a CB will go that far.

CW is Laziness
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?


Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.
the idea the radio could contact the dead was bad enough in frequency
do you need to repeat it

but one of your other nicks is hey stupid so I guess we must expect
that

SC