| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm a confused radio neophyte trying to compare two antennas using an ICOM
R8500... For the most part both the AOR MA-500 mobile whip and Nil-Jon Super M base seem to capture the same signals but the AOR generally has a much lower "noise floor". That is to say, I can hear clearer voice via the AOR because there is less background noise and scans "work" better because the squelch can be set to a lower threshold. Same physical location and connection cable using each antenna. I listen to a wide range of frequencies but have noticed this phenomenon most in 750 - 950 MHz. What causes this difference and how I can improve the Nil-Jon? The AOR MA500 is a stainless steel 29 inch magnet mount mobile scanner antenna covering 25 to 1300 MHz. Peak performance is from approximately 100 to 400 MHz. The NIL-JON Super M Base is a versatile VHF-UHF antenna providing very high performance. The receive range is 25 to 1300 MHz. It may be used for transceive applications at these frequencies: 144-148 and 435-465 MHz. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||