www.rense.com National News Media = U.S.Ministry of Propaganda on
radio and tv.

I quit listening to Nazi Public Radio = NPR over fifteen years ago.
cuhulin

On Mar 28, 8:02 pm, wrote:
www.rense.com National News Media = U.S.Ministry of Propaganda on
radio and tv.

I thought NPR stood for National Petroleum Radio since they receive
most of their funding from the oil industry. Yet another example of
disguised payola.

Anyone who gives a penny to PBS et.al. during their frequent fund
drives is a sucker. Thanks to big oil's money they don't need it, but
they'll sure take it. Plus it sustains the mirage that they are
advocates on behalf of the public interest.

Check out the corporate names as the credits roll by next time you
watch a PBS program - Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Archer Daniel Midlands,
Merck et.al., virtually all the globalist transnational corporate
heavyweights that are destroying the earth, the water, the air, the
middle class, the world.

Corporations don't give money away without expecting something in
return and NPR and PBS oblige. They are just more sophisticated about
doing so than the other networks.

"Whose bread I eat whose song I sing".

On Mar 28, 7:25*pm, wrote:
On Mar 28, 8:02 pm, wrote:

www.rense.com* National News Media = U.S.Ministry of Propaganda on
radio and tv.

I thought NPR stood for National Petroleum Radio since they receive
most of their funding from the oil industry. Yet another example of
disguised payola.

Anyone who gives a penny to PBS et.al. during their frequent fund
drives is a sucker. Thanks to big oil's money they don't need it, but
they'll sure take it. Plus it sustains the mirage that they are
advocates on behalf of the public interest.

Check out the corporate names as the credits roll by next time you
watch a PBS program - Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Archer Daniel Midlands,
Merck et.al., virtually all the globalist transnational corporate
heavyweights that are destroying the earth, the water, the air, the
middle class, the world.

Corporations don't give money away without expecting something in
return and NPR and PBS oblige. They are just more sophisticated about
doing so than the other networks.

*"Whose bread I eat whose song I sing".

Mohawk - I Support PB$ and NPR and PRI : I Buy Ga$ ! ;-} ~ RHF

Point-of-Fact : The whole PB$ and NPR and PRI Pledge
'synario-thing' is about making a Personal Public Statement
about being Committed-to-the-Cause of "Pseudo-Liberalism".

"Pseudo-Liberalism" : The 'act' {play acting} of being a
Progressive Thinker and Doer : Without having to either
Think or Do [.]

wrote in message
...
On Mar 28, 8:02 pm, wrote:
www.rense.com National News Media = U.S.Ministry of Propaganda on
radio and tv.

I thought NPR stood for National Petroleum Radio since they receive
most of their funding from the oil industry. Yet another example of
disguised payola.

Anyone who gives a penny to PBS et.al. during their frequent fund
drives is a sucker. Thanks to big oil's money they don't need it, but
they'll sure take it. Plus it sustains the mirage that they are
advocates on behalf of the public interest.

Check out the corporate names as the credits roll by next time you
watch a PBS program - Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Archer Daniel Midlands,
Merck et.al., virtually all the globalist transnational corporate
heavyweights that are destroying the earth, the water, the air, the
middle class, the world.

Corporations don't give money away without expecting something in
return and NPR and PBS oblige. They are just more sophisticated about
doing so than the other networks.

"Whose bread I eat whose song I sing".


It's a Tax Write Off dude. They "ain't" giving **** out of their pockets.

Burr

U.S.fed govt is a corporation.About nine or ten years ago, I heard
somebody on a local talk radio show say QVC (the tv shopping channel)
gives ten percent of their profits to the democraps.QVC is located in
West Chester,Pennsylvania,,, (Philadelphia metro area) so that figures.
cuhulin

wrote in message
...
On Mar 28, 10:50 pm, "Burr" wrote:

It's a Tax Write Off dude. They "ain't" giving **** out of their pockets.

You are wrong, deductions are not a $1 for $1 reduction in tax
liability. It's in the 15% to 20% range of the amount that was given.
Not a good return on their "investment", so that isn't what they are
interested in.

Influencing programming is the return that their investment brings.
Not so much regarding what you see, rather it is more a matter of
insuring what you don't see stays that way.

I can understand the "don't see" part.

I'm not a tax person so I won't say more.

Burr

On Mar 29, 12:28 am, "Burr" wrote:
I can understand the "don't see" part.

I'm not a tax person so I won't say more.

Burr

No shame in not understanding the tax part - few people do. Most
people hear the "it's a tax write off" and assume that if one donates
$100 to charity they may deduct $100 off their taxes. That isn't how
it works, you can deduct the $100 from your gross income, not your tax
liability. You do decrease your tax liability some but not to the
amount you gave away.

Of course when talking about corporations they likely aren't paying
any taxes to begin with so it is a moot question.

wrote:
On Mar 28, 8:02 pm, wrote:
www.rense.com National News Media = U.S.Ministry of Propaganda on
radio and tv.

I thought NPR stood for National Petroleum Radio since they receive
most of their funding from the oil industry. Yet another example of
disguised payola.

Anyone who gives a penny to PBS et.al. during their frequent fund
drives is a sucker. Thanks to big oil's money they don't need it, but
they'll sure take it. Plus it sustains the mirage that they are
advocates on behalf of the public interest.

Check out the corporate names as the credits roll by next time you
watch a PBS program - Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Archer Daniel Midlands,
Merck et.al., virtually all the globalist transnational corporate
heavyweights that are destroying the earth, the water, the air, the
middle class, the world.

Corporations don't give money away without expecting something in
return and NPR and PBS oblige. They are just more sophisticated about
doing so than the other networks.

"Whose bread I eat whose song I sing".

What you say could well be true. However, I have seen some, if not many,
programs that were NOT flattering to Big Oil, Pharms or the current
administration. I'm curious to hear your explanation of this apparent
contradiction...

On Mar 30, 7:00*am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 28, 8:02 pm, wrote:
www.rense.com* National News Media = U.S.Ministry of Propaganda on
radio and tv.

I thought NPR stood for National Petroleum Radio since they receive
most of their funding from the oil industry. Yet another example of
disguised payola.

Anyone who gives a penny to PBS et.al. during their frequent fund
drives is a sucker. Thanks to big oil's money they don't need it, but
they'll sure take it. Plus it sustains the mirage that they are
advocates on behalf of the public interest.

Check out the corporate names as the credits roll by next time you
watch a PBS program - Exxon-Mobil, Shell, Archer Daniel Midlands,
Merck et.al., virtually all the globalist transnational corporate
heavyweights that are destroying the earth, the water, the air, the
middle class, the world.

Corporations don't give money away without expecting something in
return and NPR and PBS oblige. They are just more sophisticated about
doing so than the other networks.

*"Whose bread I eat whose song I sing".

What you say could well be true. However, I have seen some, if not many,
programs that were NOT flattering to Big Oil, Pharms or the current
administration. I'm curious to hear your explanation of this apparent
contradiction.

BP - Two Words : **** Happens ! ;-} ~ RHF