http://specials.msn.com/Newspaper-En...aspx?GT1=34124

On Nov 1, 12:57*am, wrote:

- http://specials.msn.com/Newspaper-En...aspx?GT1=34124

Here are two simpler Lists of Newspaper Endorsements

Who Endorsed Barack Obama ? {The Longer List}
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122485442010466443.html

Who Endorsed John McCain ? {The Shorter List}
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122487558086867319.html

Telamon wrote:
In article
,
Mike wrote:

On Nov 1, 5:16?pm, dxAce wrote:
Mike wrote:

I'm moving in with one of his relatives. It will be fun
roughing it.
-- Telamon Ventura, California- - Show quoted text -
Don't forget to take a radio!
It'll have to be a wind-up radio, since under Obama we'll not be
able to afford electricity nor batteries.

Gee, I hope Obama doesn't try to sue me for saying that!

NoBama!

I think you're safe, Steve. You shouldn't lose any sleep worrying
about it!

Thanks for the URL to the Indo list!

How do you know that there will not be fascism under O-bla-ma? He seems
to be doing a good job of silencing dissent against himself so far and
he is not even in charge.

What are you talking about?

In article ,
Dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article
,
Mike wrote:

On Nov 1, 5:16?pm, dxAce wrote:
Mike wrote:

I'm moving in with one of his relatives. It will be fun
roughing it.
-- Telamon Ventura, California- - Show quoted text -
Don't forget to take a radio!
It'll have to be a wind-up radio, since under Obama we'll not be
able to afford electricity nor batteries.

Gee, I hope Obama doesn't try to sue me for saying that!

NoBama!

I think you're safe, Steve. You shouldn't lose any sleep worrying
about it!

Thanks for the URL to the Indo list!

How do you know that there will not be fascism under O-bla-ma? He seems
to be doing a good job of silencing dissent against himself so far and
he is not even in charge.

What are you talking about?

What are you not talking about?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

I promise you that the majority of Americans will have this opinion
of him after perpetual screw-ups by his administration over the next
four years.

So what's your point?

Like we haven't had eight years of perpetual screw-ups by the current
administration? Bogus wars, $4/gallon gas, economic melt down,
loss of civil rights, worst environmental record of recent times,
shipping millions of jobs overseas because Bush says "outsourcing is
GOOD for this country"...and the list goes on.

Whoever wins this election will have a long way to go just to catch up
with the "perpetual screw-ups" we've already had with the current
administration. :-(

Oh, wait a minute. Now I get what you're saying.

If screw-ups happen on Obama's 4 year watch, it's Obama's fault. If it
happened on Bush's 8 year watch, it's not Bush's fault -- and you've
got a hundred excuses why not.

Well, I've got just one word for you (and those of your ilk):

H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E

dxAce wrote:

I want that hut with a nice shiny tin roof!

Thought you already lived in one. Why do you need two? ;-)

In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I promise you that the majority of Americans will have this opinion
of him after perpetual screw-ups by his administration over the next
four years.

So what's your point?

It's beyond your ken.

Like we haven't had eight years of perpetual screw-ups by the current
administration? Bogus wars, $4/gallon gas, economic melt down,
loss of civil rights, worst environmental record of recent times,
shipping millions of jobs overseas because Bush says "outsourcing is
GOOD for this country"...and the list goes on.

Yep, your list of stupid postings is a long one.

Whoever wins this election will have a long way to go just to catch up
with the "perpetual screw-ups" we've already had with the current
administration. :-(

Keep that frown. It will sever you well after the election.

Oh, wait a minute. Now I get what you're saying.

No you don't.

If screw-ups happen on Obama's 4 year watch, it's Obama's fault. If it
happened on Bush's 8 year watch, it's not Bush's fault -- and you've
got a hundred excuses why not.

Well, I've got just one word for you (and those of your ilk):

H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E

There is a giant clue stick headed your way after the election that you
can't duck. The ringing in your ears will come from the repeated
slapping upside the head. Enjoy your punishment.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:

I want that hut with a nice shiny tin roof!

Thought you already lived in one. Why do you need two? ;-)


I think that he really wants another tin-foil hat ;-)

JB

John Barnard wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:

I want that hut with a nice shiny tin roof!

Thought you already lived in one. Why do you need two? ;-)


I think that he really wants another tin-foil hat ;-)

I understand they're standard at birth issue to dumbass Canucks.

dxAce wrote:

John Barnard wrote:

dxAce wrote:
John Barnard wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:
dxAce wrote:

I want that hut with a nice shiny tin roof!
Thought you already lived in one. Why do you need two? ;-)


I think that he really wants another tin-foil hat ;-)
I understand they're standard at birth issue to dumbass Canucks.



They are standard in countries that have excessively paranoid
populations. And it ain't us!

Come on! You folks are paranoid about the US. Without us, you are nothing.



We don't believe in the parasitic elements of your country dragging us
down. We are more without your paranoia.

JB