Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I just picked up a couple of really nice boat anchors at an auction house that was forced to shut down by recent events. An AR-88 and an R-96/SR. Other than obviously needing retubing, I have a couple of questions. First, the simplest one. Is there any source for the S-meter for the AR-88. Mine is the model without it and while it isn't really needed to use the radio it would be nice. The second is stranger. I got two manuals for the R-96/SR. mine is different from both of them. While there is a hole in the front for the crystal switch, there is no switch, there are no crystal sockets and most important, there are no numbers on the face plate where the switch would have been. Has anyone ever seen one of these? Is it an older model or a newer model and the crustal option was eliminated? One other question, I guess. Are parts available for this one, too? The dial bezel is missing and so is the power connector. Again, neither is really needed to use the radio but it would make it look nicer. Oh, yeah. Both work. The AR-88 picks up a lot but doesn't seem to have the power to drive a speaker. manual says it only had 2.5 Watts of audio, so maybe that's normal but it works great with my H-227/U headset. The R-96/SR picks up some stuff, but I think only strong signals and even some of them on MW don't come in. Defintely needs retubing. Any advice greatly appreciated. bill KB3YV |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 at 11:48:04 AM UTC-7, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
I just picked up a couple of really nice boat anchors at an auction house that was forced to shut down by recent events. An AR-88 and an R-96/SR. Other than obviously needing retubing, I have a couple of questions. First, the simplest one. Is there any source for the S-meter for the AR-88. Mine is the model without it and while it isn't really needed to use the radio it would be nice. The second is stranger. I got two manuals for the R-96/SR. mine is different from both of them. While there is a hole in the front for the crystal switch, there is no switch, there are no crystal sockets and most important, there are no numbers on the face plate where the switch would have been. Has anyone ever seen one of these? Is it an older model or a newer model and the crustal option was eliminated? One other question, I guess. Are parts available for this one, too? The dial bezel is missing and so is the power connector. Again, neither is really needed to use the radio but it would make it look nicer. Oh, yeah. Both work. The AR-88 picks up a lot but doesn't seem to have the power to drive a speaker. manual says it only had 2.5 Watts of audio, so maybe that's normal but it works great with my H-227/U headset. The R-96/SR picks up some stuff, but I think only strong signals and even some of them on MW don't come in. Defintely needs retubing. Any advice greatly appreciated. bill KB3YV Which manuals do you have for the R-96? The speaker output for the AR-88 is 600 ohms. RICH WA6KNW |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/26/20 2:02 AM, WA6KNW RICH wrote:
On Saturday, July 25, 2020 at 11:48:04 AM UTC-7, Bill Gunshannon wrote: I just picked up a couple of really nice boat anchors at an auction house that was forced to shut down by recent events. An AR-88 and an R-96/SR. Other than obviously needing retubing, I have a couple of questions. First, the simplest one. Is there any source for the S-meter for the AR-88. Mine is the model without it and while it isn't really needed to use the radio it would be nice. The second is stranger. I got two manuals for the R-96/SR. mine is different from both of them. While there is a hole in the front for the crystal switch, there is no switch, there are no crystal sockets and most important, there are no numbers on the face plate where the switch would have been. Has anyone ever seen one of these? Is it an older model or a newer model and the crustal option was eliminated? One other question, I guess. Are parts available for this one, too? The dial bezel is missing and so is the power connector. Again, neither is really needed to use the radio but it would make it look nicer. Oh, yeah. Both work. The AR-88 picks up a lot but doesn't seem to have the power to drive a speaker. manual says it only had 2.5 Watts of audio, so maybe that's normal but it works great with my H-227/U headset. The R-96/SR picks up some stuff, but I think only strong signals and even some of them on MW don't come in. Defintely needs retubing. Any advice greatly appreciated. bill KB3YV Which manuals do you have for the R-96? I have TM 11-878 and TM 11-878A which cover the R-96 and R-96A neither of which actually match the radio I have. The speaker output for the AR-88 is 600 ohms. Actually, the speaker output is 2.5 ohm. The 600 ohm was a line output intended to drive things like the PA set you heard on MASH. R-390's had 600 ohm Line Out as well. I have a number of old low impedance military speakers but none of them have any volume. I have nothing to test the 600 ohm line out with at the moment. I should also mention the I have the diversity version of the AR-88 which I think was called an AR-88F and there does not appear to be a manual available for this specific model either but for general use the existing RCA manual does the trick. bill KB3YV |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Gunshannon wrote:
I just picked up a couple of really nice boat anchors at an auction house that was forced to shut down by recent events. An AR-88 and an R-96/SR. Other than obviously needing retubing, I have a couple of questions. They do NOT need retubing. Do not just randomly go swapping tubes for no reason. Tubes are the -least- likely problem with any of these radios. First, the simplest one. Is there any source for the S-meter for the AR-88. Mine is the model without it and while it isn't really needed to use the radio it would be nice. It should just be a standard meter movement... just find a Simpson meter with the correct size and sensitivity and you should be fine. My experience with the AR-88 was mostly that nobody wanted one if they could get an R-390. There was a training room at Ft. Devens with dozens of R-390As and a couple AR-88s and absolutely nobody wanted to be at an AR-88 position. It was sure a lot nicer than typical ham gear of the day though. The second is stranger. I got two manuals for the R-96/SR. mine is different from both of them. While there is a hole in the front for the crystal switch, there is no switch, there are no crystal sockets and most important, there are no numbers on the face plate where the switch would have been. Has anyone ever seen one of these? Is it an older model or a newer model and the crustal option was eliminated? One other question, I guess. Are parts available for this one, too? The dial bezel is missing and so is the power connector. Again, neither is really needed to use the radio but it would make it look nicer. Are the manuals you have TM 11-878 and TM-878A? As far as I know, those things were intended for use on small boats and the like where the stability of a VFO might have been doubtful. But for all I know they may have had a bunch of variants of them out there. Oh, yeah. Both work. The AR-88 picks up a lot but doesn't seem to have the power to drive a speaker. manual says it only had 2.5 Watts of audio, so maybe that's normal but it works great with my H-227/U headset. The R-96/SR picks up some stuff, but I think only strong signals and even some of them on MW don't come in. Defintely needs retubing. I would be MUCH more worried about all of those paper capacitors and about the two audio electrolytics in the AR-88. Change out that stuff first. If you're really gung-ho about swapping tubes, do it one at a time with a known-good tube set. If you find performnance improves when you swap a single tube out, then you know there's an issue with that tube. But it is really not all that likely that you're going to have tube issues. Tubes are not plentiful supermarket items any more, do not just go around tossing perfectly good tubes. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/27/20 10:02 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Bill Gunshannon wrote: I just picked up a couple of really nice boat anchors at an auction house that was forced to shut down by recent events. An AR-88 and an R-96/SR. Other than obviously needing retubing, I have a couple of questions. They do NOT need retubing. Do not just randomly go swapping tubes for no reason. Tubes are the -least- likely problem with any of these radios. My experience has shown otherwise. I collect and restore antique radios as one facet of my hobbies. I have a number of tube testers (don't trust just one) and the first tube I pulled from the AR-88 was the audio output tube (6K6GT) and the emissions were about 30% of what they should have been. I don't randomly replace tubes, but I frequently find many if not all need replacement. First, the simplest one. Is there any source for the S-meter for the AR-88. Mine is the model without it and while it isn't really needed to use the radio it would be nice. It should just be a standard meter movement... just find a Simpson meter with the correct size and sensitivity and you should be fine. My experience with the AR-88 was mostly that nobody wanted one if they could get an R-390. There was a training room at Ft. Devens with dozens of R-390As and a couple AR-88s and absolutely nobody wanted to be at an AR-88 position. It was sure a lot nicer than typical ham gear of the day though. I have a couple of R390's that I am working on at the moment. Had to replace a couple tubes, but most are still OK. Biggest problem is none of the BFOs work. I was a teletype operator in the early days in the Army and worked in the AN/GRC-26D and really liked the R390. Used to be able to listen to WABC in NYC from Germany on the night shift. :-) But I think I am going to like the AR-88 as well. The second is stranger. I got two manuals for the R-96/SR. mine is different from both of them. While there is a hole in the front for the crystal switch, there is no switch, there are no crystal sockets and most important, there are no numbers on the face plate where the switch would have been. Has anyone ever seen one of these? Is it an older model or a newer model and the crustal option was eliminated? One other question, I guess. Are parts available for this one, too? The dial bezel is missing and so is the power connector. Again, neither is really needed to use the radio but it would make it look nicer. Are the manuals you have TM 11-878 and TM-878A? As far as I know, those things were intended for use on small boats and the like where the stability of a VFO might have been doubtful. But for all I know they may have had a bunch of variants of them out there. Yes, that's the manuals I have found so far. Oh, yeah. Both work. The AR-88 picks up a lot but doesn't seem to have the power to drive a speaker. manual says it only had 2.5 Watts of audio, so maybe that's normal but it works great with my H-227/U headset. The R-96/SR picks up some stuff, but I think only strong signals and even some of them on MW don't come in. Defintely needs retubing. I would be MUCH more worried about all of those paper capacitors and about the two audio electrolytics in the AR-88. Change out that stuff first. AR-88 seems fine in that department at the moment. No background hum on the audio. But, I am familiar with the electrolytic problem. I have a Philco that belonged to my parents. When I was 9 I replaced the electrolytics which were dead shorted. 5U4 plates used to glow cherry red. :-) Before my mother passed she gave me that radio. Guess what? It needs to have that same electrolytic replaced again. Exact same symptom. If you're really gung-ho about swapping tubes, do it one at a time with a known-good tube set. If you find performnance improves when you swap a single tube out, then you know there's an issue with that tube. I'm not into swapping things to find faults if I can avoid it. I have tube testers, multi-meters and even an oscilloscope. And still know how to use them. But it is really not all that likely that you're going to have tube issues. As I said, first tube tested - low emissions. Second tube tested was just fine. Haven't gotten beyond that yet. Tubes are not plentiful supermarket items any more, do not just go around tossing perfectly good tubes. I don't toss them. I even keep ones with low emissions cause I might have a radio with a tube with even lower emissions. :-) bill KB3YV |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boat Anchors. | Shortwave | |||
some boat anchors, and other goodies | Radio Photos | |||
FS: Boat Anchors....+ | Swap | |||
FS: Boat Anchors | Boatanchors | |||
Value of Boat Anchors? | Boatanchors |