Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marconi UK : we have stopped making SW transmitters and antennas, our reason
for being now ... shoddy naval software. [Source: Article by Neil Mackay, Investigations Editor, *Sunday Herald* (Scotland), 10 Oct 2004] The Royal Navy's new, state-of-the-art destroyer has been fitted with combat management software that can be hacked into, crashes easily and is vulnerable to viruses, according to one of the system's designers who was fired after raising his concerns. Gerald Wilson, who has 25 years' experience designing naval software, worked for Alenia Marconi Systems (AMS) in a joint venture with Bae Systems and the Italian company Finmeccanica on the combat system for the Type 45 destroyer, which will rely on Microsoft Windows 2000. System failure in action, he says, would leave the ship blind, defenceless, and as good as sunk. Dismissed after voicing his fears to the Ministry of Defence and the Defence Procurement Agency (DPA), Wilson wants to give evidence to the parliamentary defence select committee about the software. Last night he told Channel 4 news that "the use of Windows For Warships puts the ship and her crew at risk, and the defence of the realm". There are also plans to install a similar Microsoft Windows-based computerised command system on Britain's nuclear submarines. Wilson said: "It is inconceivable that we could allow the possible accidental release of nuclear missiles. The people who survived such an exchange, if any, would certainly regard such a thing as a crime against humanity. And I can't help feeling that even planning to deploy such systems on Windows, with its unreliability and lack of security, is itself some sort of crime in international law." Windows was chosen by AMS in order to cut costs, as the DPA has been encouraging a switch to off-the-shelf systems. Wilson says the Navy should stick to its current operating system, Unix, which is said to be more reliable. Designers can also customise Unix, which would allow unnecessary components to be removed to reduce risk. A navy spokesman said: "Bae Systems, as the prime contractor for the Type 45, is responsible for ensuring that the warship meets the requirements placed on it by the DPA. Using Microsoft Windows within combat management systems was the subject of an independent review commissioned some while ago by the DPA. "The review found a proper engineering approach had been taken, both from a security perspective, as the system middleware isolated Windows from the remainder of the mission-critical systems, and from a safety perspective. Comprehensive hardware mechanisms will be put in place where necessary to avoid any potential Windows-derived compromises. "We are satisfied that the solution recommended by the contractor will meet our requirements, as it has been subject to an independent review. This review was conducted by a team at the DPA who are independent of the Type 45 team." |