Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry
about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is really worth the money to go with bury-flex. your thought are appreciated. 73 Dave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave;
Using bury-Flex for maximum years before replacement due. Great coax. 73-Jim KC1DI wrote: What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is really worth the money to go with bury-flex. your thought are appreciated. 73 Dave |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave;
Using bury-Flex for maximum years before replacement due. Great coax. The only and most important link between transmitter and antenna. 73-Jim KC1DI wrote: What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is really worth the money to go with bury-flex. your thought are appreciated. 73 Dave |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
for what bands dave?
for HF RG213 would do you nicely but if your doing VHF/UHF you really need a good coax like 9913F or LMR400 they have a buryflex just dont recall the model number keep in mind at VHF freqs 100 or more you really start to lose a lot of RF with cheap coax RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot good luck KC1DI wrote: What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is really worth the money to go with bury-flex. your thought are appreciated. 73 Dave |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dennis Kaylor wrote:
RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot With 200 ft. of RG-58 on 400 Mhz, one doesn't even need an antenna. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Dennis Kaylor wrote: RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot With 200 ft. of RG-58 on 400 Mhz, one doesn't even need an antenna. :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Or a tuner. Dale W4OP |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or an SWR meter....:/ With that much loss, even a dead short
would probably look acceptable... As far as 213 coax, it *is * a direct bury coax. You can bury it no problem. Rg-6 is a 75 ohm coax used for TV/Cable. It will work, but it would be better to use a 50 ohm line, being you have a 50 ohm rig...Will cause you appx a 1.4 to 1 mismatch, with is no big deal really...It will reduce your "usable" bandwidth though...I use 213 on VHF for short runs...Some loss, but not enough to kill you...None of my coax runs are over 50 feet..MK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have about 175 ft of Davis "Direct Bury" Low Loss 9914F total at my
station. It is superb 50 ohm low loss coax that requires no "garden hose" or "pvc" tubing. Just slit the soil or trench it and lay the coax in. At HF frequencies it is virtually lossless. It is within .1db in loss as compared to 9913 plus it is very flexible and can be used on rotators directly where 9913 cannot. And moreover 9913 cannot be buried directly. IMHO it is the best coax to use. -- Charlie Ham Radio - AD5TH www.ad5th.com wrote in message oups.com... Or an SWR meter....:/ With that much loss, even a dead short would probably look acceptable... As far as 213 coax, it *is * a direct bury coax. You can bury it no problem. Rg-6 is a 75 ohm coax used for TV/Cable. It will work, but it would be better to use a 50 ohm line, being you have a 50 ohm rig...Will cause you appx a 1.4 to 1 mismatch, with is no big deal really...It will reduce your "usable" bandwidth though...I use 213 on VHF for short runs...Some loss, but not enough to kill you...None of my coax runs are over 50 feet..MK |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:59:19 GMT, Dennis Kaylor
wrote: for what bands dave? for HF RG213 would do you nicely but if your doing VHF/UHF you really need a good coax like 9913F or LMR400 they have a buryflex just dont recall the model number keep in mind at VHF freqs 100 or more you really start to lose a lot of RF with cheap coax RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot good luck Better check your numbers again. RG213 is more like 4.7 dB/100' @400MHz |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KC1DI wrote:
What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is really worth the money to go with bury-flex. your thought are appreciated. 73 Dave I used to bury RG-213. It'll last longer if you slide it into some cheap garden hose before burying. Scrap and second hand hardline is a better bet and is really long-lasting. I got some new scrap pieces of over 100' of 1/2" Andrew for free and bought 200' of used 7/8" Andrew hardline with connectors locally for $50. It replaced 1/2" stuff at VHF/UHF. The difference is noticeable. Check with your local broadcast stations and 2-way radio shops. Dave Heil K8MN |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Coax experiment | Shortwave | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave |