Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 11:19 AM
KC1DI
 
Posts: n/a
Default coax

What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry
about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is
really worth the money to go with bury-flex.
your thought are appreciated.
73 Dave

  #2   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 11:53 AM
Jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave;
Using bury-Flex for maximum years before replacement due.
Great coax.
73-Jim

KC1DI wrote:
What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry
about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is
really worth the money to go with bury-flex.
your thought are appreciated.
73 Dave


  #3   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 11:53 AM
Jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave;
Using bury-Flex for maximum years before replacement due.
Great coax. The only and most important link between transmitter and
antenna.
73-Jim

KC1DI wrote:
What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry
about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is
really worth the money to go with bury-flex.
your thought are appreciated.
73 Dave


  #4   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 11:59 AM
Dennis Kaylor
 
Posts: n/a
Default

for what bands dave?
for HF RG213 would do you nicely
but if your doing VHF/UHF you really need a good coax like 9913F or
LMR400 they have a buryflex just dont recall the model number
keep in mind at VHF freqs 100 or more you really start to lose a lot of
RF with cheap coax
RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot
good luck

KC1DI wrote:

What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry
about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is
really worth the money to go with bury-flex.
your thought are appreciated.
73 Dave

  #5   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 02:00 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dennis Kaylor wrote:
RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot


With 200 ft. of RG-58 on 400 Mhz, one doesn't even
need an antenna. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---


  #6   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 04:08 PM
Dale Parfitt
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Dennis Kaylor wrote:
RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot


With 200 ft. of RG-58 on 400 Mhz, one doesn't even
need an antenna. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Or a tuner.


Dale W4OP



  #7   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 08:43 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Or an SWR meter....:/ With that much loss, even a dead short
would probably look acceptable...
As far as 213 coax, it *is * a direct bury coax. You can bury it
no problem. Rg-6 is a 75 ohm coax used for TV/Cable.
It will work, but it would be better to use a 50 ohm line, being
you have a 50 ohm rig...Will cause you appx a 1.4 to 1 mismatch,
with is no big deal really...It will reduce your "usable" bandwidth
though...I use 213 on VHF for short runs...Some loss, but not
enough to kill you...None of my coax runs are over 50 feet..MK

  #8   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 09:23 PM
Charlie
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have about 175 ft of Davis "Direct Bury" Low Loss 9914F total at my
station. It is superb 50 ohm low loss coax that requires no "garden hose"
or "pvc" tubing. Just slit the soil or trench it and lay the coax in. At HF
frequencies it is virtually lossless. It is within .1db in loss as compared
to 9913 plus it is very flexible and can be used on rotators directly where
9913 cannot. And moreover 9913 cannot be buried directly.

IMHO it is the best coax to use.

--

Charlie
Ham Radio - AD5TH
www.ad5th.com





wrote in message
oups.com...
Or an SWR meter....:/ With that much loss, even a dead short
would probably look acceptable...
As far as 213 coax, it *is * a direct bury coax. You can bury it
no problem. Rg-6 is a 75 ohm coax used for TV/Cable.
It will work, but it would be better to use a 50 ohm line, being
you have a 50 ohm rig...Will cause you appx a 1.4 to 1 mismatch,
with is no big deal really...It will reduce your "usable" bandwidth
though...I use 213 on VHF for short runs...Some loss, but not
enough to kill you...None of my coax runs are over 50 feet..MK



  #9   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 04:35 PM
Wes Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:59:19 GMT, Dennis Kaylor
wrote:

for what bands dave?
for HF RG213 would do you nicely
but if your doing VHF/UHF you really need a good coax like 9913F or
LMR400 they have a buryflex just dont recall the model number
keep in mind at VHF freqs 100 or more you really start to lose a lot of
RF with cheap coax
RG213 at 400mhz @100ft is more than 9db of loss which is a lot
good luck


Better check your numbers again. RG213 is more like 4.7 dB/100'
@400MHz
  #10   Report Post  
Old April 14th 05, 06:08 PM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

KC1DI wrote:

What type of coax are you using for direct burial ? I need to burry
about 100 feet to get to my new antenna and was wondering if it is
really worth the money to go with bury-flex.
your thought are appreciated.
73 Dave


I used to bury RG-213. It'll last longer if you slide it into some
cheap garden hose before burying. Scrap and second hand hardline is a
better bet and is really long-lasting. I got some new scrap pieces of
over 100' of 1/2" Andrew for free and bought 200' of used 7/8" Andrew
hardline with connectors locally for $50. It replaced 1/2" stuff at
VHF/UHF. The difference is noticeable.

Check with your local broadcast stations and 2-way radio shops.

Dave Heil K8MN


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Coax experiment [email protected] Shortwave 6 March 22nd 05 12:23 PM
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} RHF Antenna 27 November 3rd 04 01:38 PM
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} RHF Shortwave 23 November 3rd 04 01:38 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Shortwave 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017