Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
oups.com... jamulc wrote: What I'd like to know is if there's a DSP audio filter that really makes any difference in making speech (on AM signals) more intelligible through DSP reduction of noise. Best & 73, jamulc If greater speech intelligibility is what you want, then you should consider one of the Clearspeech filters, especially the Clearspeech "base unit". These aren't available new anymore, but you can find them on ebay. In fact, one is up for auction right now: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...sPageName=WDVW (I have nothing to do with this auction, do not know the seller, etc.) I've been using one of these for several months now and I love it. I hardly ever listen to SSB without it. It's great at reducing "white noise" and making weak signals more intelligible. (You will not want to use it on AM, except perhaps under very unusual circumstances.) Steve NCT Group offers a demo software for processing short sound files http://www.nctclearspeech.com/cspc.htm. NCT is the developer of the Clear Speech algorithms used in the Am-Com unit listed above and in the newer Heil Sound NCT Group Clear Speech Speaker listed at $210 at http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/cle...ch_speaker.htm. The latter might have more recent algorithms than the Am-Com. The GAP http://www.gapantenna.com/hearit.htm HEAR IT Speaker for US$149 from W4RT http://www.w4rt.com/ is the rebranded bhi NES10-2 Noise Eliminating Extension Speaker (£99.95)http://www.bhinstrumentation.co.uk/h...10-2_mkii.html. The SGC ADSP2 DSP speaker http://sgcworld.com/shopsite_sc/store/html/page4.html is priced at $129.95, claims 26 dB noise reduction versus bhi's claim of 35 dB and appears to have auto notch filtering. The noise reduction numbers may be misleading if the reduction algorithms are different. Intelligible speech is the real objective - not noise reduction per se - and all systems will have processing artefacts that contribute their own unique distortions. The real story can only be found out by subjective listening tests to the same material of wide variety. Both bhi and SGC offer before and after sound files. It's possible to process the bhi/SGC 'before' files though the ClearSpeech-PC software and compare the results to their 'after' files. I tried that - it's pretty messy but I thought the bhi/GAP came out on top. Their in-line module provides more controls than their speaker so is more 'tunable'. A ham I know says he prefers the bhi/GAP in-line module after having tried all the DSP boxes out there. Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MFJ-752x and audio filters for swl | Shortwave | |||
FA: Timewave 599ZX | Swap | |||
stuff for all hams | General | |||
FS Timewave 599zx DSP | Shortwave | |||
FS Timewave 599zx DSP | Swap |