Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert casey wrote:
Noticed when listening to old airchecks of Musicradio 77 WABC New York, that they played on average 2 songs, then one long or two short commercials, than another 2 songs, and another commercial, then 2 more songs, etc. This in contrast to radio stations today playing a 40 minute block of music and then 15 minutes of solid commercials. I realize that commercials are necessary, but I find that I'll accept one or two commercials before I start wanting to hit the button on the car radio to bail to another station. (I live in one market, and also can listen to another station with a similar format in an adjacent market area, and they time their stop sets at different times of the hour). I don't know if this listener tolerance to short stop sets has ever been tested. Or is the current structure an artifact of the way ratings books are done? That stations will sacrifice the last quarter hour for solid 1,2, and 3rd quarters? Most commercials seem to get played between XX:45 and the top of the hour. I think the basic argument is that listeners change the station as soon as a commercial comes on, so if you pile all the commercials into one long slot, you wind up with listeners tuned to the station for a longer time period at one crack. From the standpoint of an advertiser, this should be considered a bad thing, but it results in better identification with the listener. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy | |||
FM Channel Spacing vs. Carrier Bandwidth vs. Audio Response | General | |||
New 1.8 KHz Spacing For Commercial Aero Channels ? | Scanner | |||
Disturbing ad | Broadcasting |