On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:03:55 -0700, running dogg wrote:

I don't listen to shortwave radio for hours at a stretch. At best, I'll
listen to a half hour of news on the BBC, and RHC's 10 minute news
bulletin-per night. I don't listen to much music. Now tell me again,
David, why I should pay $13/mo for something I'll only use for 2 1/2
hours per week (BBC doesn't have current events coverage on weekends)?
That's about 80 cents an hour. Pricey. I doubt that most people listen
to any more than one or two of satellite radio's dozens of channels.
When Howard Stern moved to Sirius, only about a third of his over the
air fan base moved with him, leading Stern to berate his former fans as
cheap. Satellite radio isn't worth the cost for all but the most
dedicated users. Considering that most people watch 6 hours of TV a day,
cable TV is cheap. But most people don't listen to the radio for hours
on end.

Anybody who watches 6 hours of TV a days is a Zombie.

I listen to Newshour and the World Today, plus a lot of the 6 minutes
newscasts on the BBC. An hour of R. Netherlands at 9PM. R. Australia
at Midnight (if I'm up). All in very nice static-free sound.

I live in the Mountains. There is no reliable FM here. People in big
cities have similar problems sometimes. Multipath, interference,
pledge drives, etc.

If I buy one less CD a month due to the wide variety of music on
satellite I'm ahead financially, aren't I?