Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

I could support that.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:50:10 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly:


I could support that.

I could not.

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...

I could support that.

SC

Even if the no-code ticket was made 6 months or 2 years
in active length it would not matter one bit. Amateur radio
in the public eye is unknown and your average young person
is far more interested in the Internet, online video, instant text
messaging and cellphones. There are too many commercially
available technologies, which are far cheaper I may add, than
amateur radio which while a curosity is still a functionally and
technologically obsolete pursuit. Sorry but that's the truth.

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

No support.

"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net...

I could support that.

SC

--

SeeYaa:) Harbin Osteen KG6URO

When American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance
to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too?

-

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Get a life......
"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...

I could support that.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Douche Bag wrote:
The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.

not dead dispite the efforts folks like the arrl and slow code to kill
it

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote:

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or
a little bit of effort.

The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and
try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could
support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't
happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so
can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of
the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters.

--
-fb-

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

"etagg" wrote in
:

Get a life......


Get a real license.

Sc

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

funkbastler wrote in
:

On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote:

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice,
or a little bit of effort.

The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and
try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could
support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it
won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code,
then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in
this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters.


There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof.

SC

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:19:21 GMT, Slow Code wrote:



There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof.


Well, I don't know KB9RQZ - but I'll say thay he's entitled to have
and express his opinions, same as you and I, whether you or I agree
with him or not.

Y'all try to stay away from the ad hominem stuff now - it never convinces
anybody of anything. Just ****es 'em off.

--
-fb-

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

In article ,
says...
On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote:

The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code.
Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or
a little bit of effort.

The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and
try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could
support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't
happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so
can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of
the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters.



I took the code test (novice 5WPM) back in 73 in high school, and had
the totally worthless (to me) Novice ticket for 2 years or whatever it
was. I spent a lot of time practicing CW, back then and also about 10
years ago, and can't seem to get past 7-8WPM, so I gave up on it, the
sound of it annoys me anyway. It wasn't worth the stress it caused me to
work HF. of course, since I DID pass the 5WPM test, I can be a general
now. But, the interest has passed. I have a 2M mobile and an HT, but if
I buy an HF rig, it's going to be to listen, but not to other hams,
that's as boring as it gets. If I want to hear about hip replacements,
and stuff like that, I can visit the folks at the assisted living place
my mom's in.

I don't care about HF anymore, the code requirement outlasted my
interest in HF. I wanted to be on HF from the time I was a little kid to
about age 40 or so. No longer. I have my other hobbies now, guns, PCs,
home theater, and dogs. Not much time or budget left for ham radio.

Just because you and I were forced to learn it does it mean a new ham
should. It's an obsolete mode in most respects, handy in a certain type
of emergency, but of little other use, except communicating with other
people using it. Nobody's stopping them. Nobody should have to learn it
either.

But it's funny, the people I hear, both on HF and 2M and 440 causing all
the real problems are people who didn't get a no code license,
supposedly don't have a "CB mentality", yet do many of the things you
can hear on 11 meters all the time, keying up on top of other hams,
harassing hams, ignoring calls, etc, based on their call sign timeframe
(Thinking if the ham was ticketed after xx-xx-1990 or whatever, they are
a "hamster", etc). Seems like the code makes you this way, or maybe
getting old does.

I would gladly take the "CB mentality" over the stuff the so-called
"good hams" pull.

BDK

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Slow Code wrote:
I could support that.

SC

I support licensing for life.

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
ups.com:

Slow Code wrote:

I could support that.

SC

I support licensing for life.

Whimp!

SC

Whimp???

I'll thumb wrestle you for it.

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

funkbastler wrote:
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:19:21 GMT, Slow Code wrote:



There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof.


Well, I don't know KB9RQZ - but I'll say thay he's entitled to have
and express his opinions, same as you and I, whether you or I agree
with him or not.

Y'all try to stay away from the ad hominem stuff now - it never convinces
anybody of anything. Just ****es 'em off.

There's nothing "ad hominem" about comments directed towards
Morkie the Moron, KB9RQZ. His CV of idiocity is volumous.

Steve, K4YZ

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

"Barry OGrady" wrote in message
...
Code has been eliminated completely as a requirement for amateur radio
since 2 years ago, and its not coming back. I have a full call with no
code.

Barry

While that is true in your country, it is not yet true here. The
international conference simply left it up to each individual country as to
whether or not to require it.

Dee, N8UZE

Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
 

Dee Flint wrote:
"Barry OGrady" wrote in message
...
Code has been eliminated completely as a requirement for amateur radio
since 2 years ago, and its not coming back. I have a full call with no
code.

Barry

While that is true in your country, it is not yet true here. The
international conference simply left it up to each individual country as to
whether or not to require it.
the conference ended the intertional requireent Dee as the FCC has
started the paperwork with stated intent of doing the same here