![]() |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Mark in the Dark' wrote in
: On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:06:31 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Mark in the Dark' wrote in m: On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to upgrade. no I simply can't do it, certainly in the legal sens eof it You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses. not at all that you can't understand I understand enough to know that thousands have passed the code elements, but now that it looks like ham radio is going to get dumbed down more you refuse to be a good ham and learn it. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"Douche Bag" wrote in message oups.com... Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear about your dead code bull****. wrote: Douche, Actually a lot of people do care about CW. There is frequently a lot of CW activity on the various bands. CW has been my primary operating mode for the past few years. I have not been at it for 100 years and I am a hardcore computer geek. CW is just a pleasant change of pace for me. However, I must agree with you that some of the putzes on this group do need to get a life -- there actually is more to life (and ham radio) than CW. If it were not for my growing killfile, the QRM here would be deafening. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Anyone who uses such poor language as that used below is exactly what that
signature implies ... lacking in civility. Douche Bag wrote: Stick code up your lame old ass. No one cares about code, let alone hams, shortwave, etc. Get a ****ing life. No one here wants to hear about your dead code bull****. wrote: |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com