RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Swap (https://www.radiobanter.com/swap/)
-   -   Turkeys on two meters. (https://www.radiobanter.com/swap/110193-turkeys-two-meters.html)

Slow Code November 23rd 06 12:02 AM

Turkeys on two meters.
 
Used to be able to hear technical things, now all I got to listen
to is turkeys. They gooble back and forth at each other.

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.

SC

an_old_friend November 23rd 06 02:31 AM

crapthon goes on
 

Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.

if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much

SC



Bret Ludwig November 24th 06 08:48 PM

crapthon goes on
 

an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.

if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much



How much CW do you hear on two meters? Not very much. CW is primarily
a HF mode.


Radiosrfun November 24th 06 10:07 PM

crapthon goes on
 
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
ps.com...

an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.

if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much



How much CW do you hear on two meters? Not very much. CW is primarily
a HF mode.


Guess I may as well plonk the rest of you guys too. This CW / Code argument
is disgusting. What the **** are you going to argue about IF and WHEN the
FCC should decide to DROP it? Get a ****ing life already. Most of you have
been plonked to avoid reading this stupid ****. Start a ****ing news group -
CW/CODE and it's benefits or lack thereof - LEAVE this room for what it is
for - SWAPPING.



Bret Ludwig November 24th 06 10:26 PM

crapthon goes on
 

Radiosrfun wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
ps.com...

an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.
if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much



How much CW do you hear on two meters? Not very much. CW is primarily
a HF mode.


Guess I may as well plonk the rest of you guys too. This CW / Code argument
is disgusting. What the **** are you going to argue about IF and WHEN the
FCC should decide to DROP it? Get a ****ing life already. Most of you have
been plonked to avoid reading this stupid ****. Start a ****ing news group -
CW/CODE and it's benefits or lack thereof - LEAVE this room for what it is
for - SWAPPING.


Heavy crossposting has occurred. You can help by restricting posts to
the relevant group.


Radiosrfun November 25th 06 01:37 AM

crapthon goes on
 
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
oups.com...

Radiosrfun wrote:
"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
ps.com...

an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.
if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much


How much CW do you hear on two meters? Not very much. CW is primarily
a HF mode.


Guess I may as well plonk the rest of you guys too. This CW / Code
argument
is disgusting. What the **** are you going to argue about IF and WHEN the
FCC should decide to DROP it? Get a ****ing life already. Most of you
have
been plonked to avoid reading this stupid ****. Start a ****ing news
group -
CW/CODE and it's benefits or lack thereof - LEAVE this room for what it
is
for - SWAPPING.


Heavy crossposting has occurred. You can help by restricting posts to
the relevant group.


Cross posting isn't so bad, as this stupid discussion has gone on for so
damned long and it HAS ruined a "few" groups already, not just the "Swap"
group. This horse has been beaten so bad past death - it is almost leather.
The FCC most likely "will" drop it, so why not just move on. CW is a mode -
just like all others. It doesn't really do much more than prove you
"learned" something. IT won't repair your radios and is SURE in hell doesn't
keep the riffraff off the bands. The "manuals" need to be strengthened on
content - to get those back in that "know" the subject, not just a bunch of
one liner answers. Any "idiot" can learn that.
CW, SSB, FM, AM, RTTY, ATV, whatever - pick a mode or two or three - and
ENJOY. NOT ONE OF THEM will make you a "better" operator. AND YES, to
"qualify" for being able to speak, I AM a 20 WPM extra. Been one for quite a
while - so what! I've given my call in here in the past - unlike Mr. Slow
Code - who has yet to prove himself. He bitches about the "code" being
abolished. WHY did he pick "SLOW CODE"? Maybe because "HE" can't do code? OR
he does it at a slow pace because that is all he can muster. HE is a "SLOW
LEARNER"? And he wants it reinstated to 20 WPM? That is laughable. Yeah,
I've banished most of the repliers to this. It is a shame, my list shows 20
or whatever posts at the start of the loading - then all the sudden due to
the filtering - NONE show up. This group had issues before with topics here
and there, but this one has "ruined" this group. I "used" to enjoy the FS
listings and hell - even the FAs for that matter - which sure beats the ****
out of this OVER USED - LAME topic. It is time to move on. There are far
more important issues facing our country and world than a "mode" of
operation. If people spent 1/8 the time being so strong on education as they
are about this - maybe the education system wouldn't suck so bad and the
kids today "might" learn something. Most schools - at least around here -
have quit teaching trades. I guess they figure we have no further need for -
welders, brick/block layers, machinists, electricians, electronics techs,
etc. They're too worried about "football" stadiums. Sad to say - all that is
doing is driving up the tax base for those who can't afford it. Even the
teachers aren't being paid well due to it. FOOTBALL - is a nice sport, but
not our future. MAYBE - JUST MAYBE - ONE out of any 10 graduating classes
will make it to the "pros". GET BACK TO REALITY. You want to ARGUE CODE?
OK - SUPPORT the "bolstering" of the "Trade" to go with it. THEN you'll have
my support.



[email protected] November 25th 06 09:41 AM

FAGthon goes on
 

wrote:
On 24 Nov 2006 23:26:42 -0800, "an_old_friend"
wrote:


wrote:
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 23:24:48 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

Bret Ludwig wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.
if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much


How much CW do you hear on two meters? Not very much. CW is primarily
a HF mode.

If an FM rig is all one has for 2m, it is easy to believe that there is
little CW activity on that band.

it is also easy to believe with multimode rig too dave

Dave K8MN
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

the constition amend 10 restricts anything note covered by the document
to states or to the people

the supremacy cluase makes the constituion and the traties the supreme
law of the land

therfore anything not coevered by the constituion or by treaty is Mine

therefore as matter of law the burden is on the resrictin to prove it
is needed till 2003 code testing had that ..now it does not have that
most persons agreed ONLY the treaty langauge kept the testing in place

why drop it becuase it can not justified as a matter of law

interesting that the forger chooses to forge this post a copy of one I
made elsewhere


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com





mopy wants your fudge


Slow Code November 28th 06 12:26 AM

Turkeys on two meters.
 
Markie wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.


if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much



If you would stop crapping on the net 24/7 you'd have more study time too.

SC

Andy the Perv Timberlake November 29th 06 09:26 PM

kookathon
 

wrote:
not on 24/7


Your posting dates and times say otherwise. How's your shemale "wife"
taking that?

but I wasted an hour a day for 5 years not interested in wasting more
time on something I lack the talent for


Markie admits making intelligent post is something in which he lacks
talent!


Andy the Perv Timberlake November 29th 06 09:48 PM

kookathon
 

wrote:
On 29 Nov 2006 13:26:09 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
not on 24/7


Your posting dates and times say otherwise. How's your shemale "wife"
taking that?

no woger my psoting times are not saying saying that nor do I have a
shemal;e wife


Wrong on all counts, dumbass. You post late at night and all day and
you do have a shemale wife.


but I wasted an hour a day for 5 years not interested in wasting more
time on something I lack the talent for


Markie admits making intelligent post is something in which he lacks
talent!


no woger you need to learn to read


No, Morkie, you need to learn how to write and read in English.

I have wasted my time on code which is not a matter of intelegence


Which is a good thing since you lack any intelligence. You can't eevn
do 5 wpm code.

otherwise you NEVER would have passed without a lot more blowjobs


Telling us how you managed to pass your no-code tech, Marqueer?


Not Cocksucker Lloyd November 29th 06 10:10 PM

kookathon
 

wrote:
Andy the Perv Timberlake wrote:
wrote:
On 29 Nov 2006 13:26:09 -0800, "Andy the Perv Timberlake"
wrote:


wrote:
not on 24/7

Your posting dates and times say otherwise. How's your shemale "wife"
taking that?
no woger my psoting times are not saying saying that nor do I have a
shemal;e wife


Wrong on all counts, dumbass. You post late at night and all day and
you do have a shemale wife.


Yes I post often late at night so do you


Nope wrong again, ****tard.


no shemale wife though


You've never posted proof otherwise, kiddie raper.



but I wasted an hour a day for 5 years not interested in wasting more
time on something I lack the talent for

Markie admits making intelligent post is something in which he lacks
talent!

no woger you need to learn to read


No, Morkie, you need to learn how to write and read in English.


I can you can't even spell my name right


YOu can't even spell your own name right, since you never post under
it.


I have wasted my time on code which is not a matter of intelegence


Which is a good thing since you lack any intelligence.


wel you agree


I agree *you* are too ****ing stupid to pass it.
You've admitted that.


otherwise you NEVER would have passed without a lot more blowjobs


Telling us how you managed to pass your no-code tech, Marqueer?


by knowing the materail


BWHAHAHAHA You can't even spell "material" correctly, ****tard, much
less know it.

how did you pass? twice i might add


And you can't even pass it ONCE.... BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Lloyd Davies November 30th 06 02:18 PM

Turkeys on two meters.
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
ink.net...
Markie wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:

If they don't have to learn CW, they just don't study as much.


if they take the time to learn Morse Code they can't study as much



If you would stop crapping on the net 24/7 you'd have more study time too.

SC

I PUNCE
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
http://www.qsl.net/n0vfp/




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com