![]() |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
|
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
Hurray! ! ! Next step? No more testing at all--just get a radio and join
the CBers and truckers with all the filth! ! ! "A.E. 352" wrote in message ... http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:04:08 GMT, "A.E. 352"
wrote: http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 There goes the neighborhood! (Good Buddy) S.T.W. |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
SEAR's and WAL-MART having a ham radio license sale !!
Makes one glad to be a "short-timer" in age. erg "JA" wrote in message . net... Hurray! ! ! Next step? No more testing at all--just get a radio and join the CBers and truckers with all the filth! ! ! "A.E. 352" wrote in message ... http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
Its about damn time. CW is outdated and has been an impedement to new
hams for years. With the new frequency allotments we should be in line for some interesting times in ham radio. al goss wrote: SEAR's and WAL-MART having a ham radio license sale !! Makes one glad to be a "short-timer" in age. erg "JA" wrote in message . net... Hurray! ! ! Next step? No more testing at all--just get a radio and join the CBers and truckers with all the filth! ! ! "A.E. 352" wrote in message ... http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
|
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
Sum Ting Wong wrote in
: On 16 Dec 2006 11:45:28 -0800, wrote: Its about damn time. CW is outdated and has been an impedement to new hams for years. With the new frequency allotments we should be in line for some interesting times in ham radio. I noticed that the entry level licenses have been code test free for quite awhile now. I see the dumbing down of the ham radio hobby as just another form of welfare, rewarding folks who have no initiative or who aren't motivated or committed to get off their fat asses and work for something that will benefit them. My only hope is that the written exams continue to stay in place to filter out folks who are too darn stupid to read and write. S.T.W. Amen. When organizations like MARS can't forward a message because nobody took the time to learn code, then and only then will the significance of this mistake be felt. I hope organizations like MARS make CW a requirement for membership. de N9LCP |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
It's the money stupid, not the hobby! !
"A.E. 352" wrote in message ... http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
"JA" wrote in news:6Y1hh.10152$hI.7696
@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net: It's the money stupid, not the hobby! ! "A.E. 352" wrote in message ... http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 Who you calling stupid? It's not about the money. How does the FCC make any money by eliminating cw? It's about this country following in the footsteps of other countries that dropped the cw requirements. While there are a few who can not demonstrate enough cw proficency to get an hf endorsement, there are 1000 behind each one complaining cw is to hard. Oh boo hoo, to difficult or to lazy. I choose the later. I thought the no-code tech was a good idea because it gave you a taste of what the hobby is about. In this area there was a 2 meter repeater cross linked to a 10 meter repeater. Years ago as a VE, I use to do parlor tricks bringing up the link, talking to someone 1000 or more miles away and watching the students jaws drop. I understand what it feels like to to be unable to demonstrate enough cw proficency for an upgrade. I'm stuck at 13wpm, can't do it any faster, but at least I was able to do 5wpm and then with a lot of hard work I managed to raise the bar to 13wpm and get my General Class. Frankly, I don't do much cw because of a physical limitation, but when you NEED as in an emergency to get a message through, cw in some cases is the only way. The FCC could and should change the ruling. I think demonstrating some form of proficiency at 3-5 wpm would be fair. Do you realize how slow that is? What's the point of cooking steak if your to lazy to chew it? -snip- |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
Duh......oh well forget it
"A.E. 352" wrote in message ... http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...ewnews&id=1231 |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
the sky is falling oh my oh my--no code, no steam engines, no dials on
phones, no steamships, no reheating the leftovers in the oven, no cloth diapers, and they even have taken the cranks off the fronts of the cars (how will we start them) |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
|
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts.
If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
because less than one half of one percent of them say cw is to difficult.
73 de N9LCP - Marc Where did you ever get this number from ? |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
So your reply is somehow 'special'? Why do you not practice your own
recommendation? "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts. If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
Ron wrote in :
because less than one half of one percent of them say cw is to difficult. 73 de N9LCP - Marc Where did you ever get this number from ? Applying some diligence. I don't keep spreadsheets or records. The question itself regarding the elimination of cw has been an active topic for many years. Do some research among people who "HAD" to take the test since the inception of the no-code tech license. I was amazed to find among those people who "HAD" to take the test that perhaps 1 in 250 criticized cw as a dinosaur that should of died years ago. By their own admission, they felt "annoyed" taking the cw test as they believed cw had no useful purpose. Opinions expressed were wide and varied. However, one opinion that stood out from the rest was the speed qualifications. Most thought the minimum speeds presently associated with a class of license were not fair. Some thought as an example, speeds of 3 for Novice, 5 for Tech, 7 for General, 10 for Advanced and 13 for Extra were more appropriate. I'm sure if you conducted a poll breaking the responses down into categories such as type of license, how often they use cw and for what purpose, you'll come up with numbers all over the place. The reasons I stated for not eliminating cw are entirely my own. Marc |
NO MORE MORSE TESTING !!!
"Zommbee" wrote in
: So your reply is somehow 'special'? Why do you not practice your own recommendation? "Bill Turner" wrote in message ... Please folks, do not reply to these off topic posts. If these idiots never get any replies, they will eventually give up and go away. Thanks, Bill, W6WRT That's gonna leave a bruise! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com