RadioBanter - View Single Post - Element 1, Code vs. No-code, and Dad

October 29th 03, 03:44 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (N2EY)
writes:

Try not to strain yourself putting words into others' messages.

What "words have I put in others messages", Len?

Those following -

It's clear from your many, many posts here that you want amateur radio to
become a multiband version of cb.

That's just your DELUSION and fantasy.

Why?

You are not a licensee in the Amateur Radio service.

You have no vested interest in the Amateur Radio service, either
in a pecuniary interest, or it's practical value as it exists.

You bad mouth anyone and everyone who dares to stand up for it,
wether they "support" your version of code testing or not.

I'd say you support a multiband version of CB...That may not
havev been your exact words, but it's certainly what you've been
pontificating for.

You rail against "rank, status and privilege", and you make it clear you want
one class of license, or no licenses at all.

I've never been for "no license at all." Poor baby, still delerious.

You've suggested this on several occassions, stating that the
"one license fits all" should be a "license for everyone". So what's
the difference, Lennie?

You're against any sort of standards, values, or traditions in amateur radio.

I'm not interested in the standards, values or traditions of the
Archaic Radiotelegraphy Service.

Stop trying to be a proselyte for the Past.

He was talking about the Amateur Radio service, Lennie...What's
this "Archaic Radiotelegraphy Service" you cite? It's not in FCC
regs.

You call HIM "delusional", yet YOU are citing some radio service
that does not exist...Guess this fits right in with your assertion of
radio services that exists "solely for recreational purposes" that you
tried to pawn off on us a year ago.

Still doesn't fir the facts, Sir Putzalot.

You're constantly criticizing ARRL without justification, and even accusing
them of fraud - again, with no evidence.

Plenty of evidence of hypocrisy, false "representation," no verification
of their alleged ability to "know what is best for amateur radio."

Absolutely NO evidence has been provided by YOU, despite your
assertions to the contrary.

And we're STILL waiting on your "proof" that the ARRL is
dishonest.

That was yet another LennieLie that's yet to be substantiated.

You deny the homebrewing success of others, and the public service
contributions of radio amateurs.

I've never "denied it," delusional fellow.

You've never offered proof YOUR wonderful amazing state-of-the-art
homebrew radios worked...or even existed.

And you've never offered us any proof of YOUR "state-of-the-art"
projects either, Lennie. Whare are they?

Quite clear what you would like amateur radio to become, good buddy ;-)

I'm NOT your "good buddy." Haven't you got your eyes in?

You got THAT one right, Lennie...I doubt you are ANYone's "good
buddy".

I know I wouldn't hang out with an idiot like you.

I'm simply pointing out where your many complaining posts lead. If all of the
things you complain about were eliminated from amateur radio, it would become
quite like cb. You'd like that, I think.

No, you are just voicing your fantasies and delusions and terrible
parsimonous pique and not honoring and respecting your noble
viewpoints.

A lie on your part, Leonard H Anderson.

You've "offered" numerous acidic assertions about Amateur Radio
in general and many licensed Amateurs in particular, yet offer "proof"
on none of them.

You were much better on the pulpit with your old Sermons On
The Antenna Mount.

Typical personal insult from Len rather than debating the issue.

You are preachy to a fault. You need a refresher at the
seminary. Or a retreat.

Just one more "DoAsISayNotDoAsIDo" Lennism, two faced scumbag
that he is...

We can find hundreds of LennieRants making the very same
accussation authored by Lennie.

Not much. But by the time I became aware of it, I was repelled by the immature
behavior of some of the users there.

:-)

How old were you in 1958? How "mature" were you that you could
"judge" others?

How old are YOU in 2003, Lennie. You seem to have the same
problem TODAY.

What did YOU do to keep that service from becoming such a wasteland?

Irrelevant. CB has far too many users for too little bandspace.

So we are just going to allow that type of behaviour to run
rampant through the spectrum...?!?!

What have YOU done to eliminate CB or reduce all that waste?

But...but...but...LENNIE!

YOU are the "radio professional", here! You've been telling us
that all along!

What are YOU doing to make it better?

YOU seem to know all, be all, yet do nothing of value except
extoll your own alleged expertise in OLD radio arts.

Whew! Didya get bruised by the door swinging back and smacking
you in the face, Your Putziness?

How many rants have ceneterd over what you did in 1950s era Japan
at a rear area radio relay statuion...?!?!

YOU've had 45 years to correct things.

Not my responsibility, Len. I'm not a cb user. Never have been. All I did was
listen there, and tune away in disgust.

Poor baby. "Disgust," is it?

Must be, Lennie.

And must be YOU are disgusted, too...You've told us about how
utilitarian CB is, yet I've challenged you to tell us just HOW
"utilitarian" it is by detailing your use of it...

You've not done so.

I'm know many cb users are fine people, but the service is a mess, has been
for decades, and it was a mistake to have ever been created.

Poor thing. You could have DONE something for the betterment
of mankind in 45 years, yet you have not...

YOU could have done so for 70+ years, Lennie.

Where are YOU accomplishments? I do not own ONE electronic
device that says "Made Better By LHA" on it.

What have YOU done to fix cb?

Irrelevant. What needs to be "fixed?" Restore it to radio amateurs?

Only an idiot would ask "What needs to be "fixed?"" about CB
radio.

Oh...wait...an idiot DID ask what was wrong!

You can always file a petition with FCC to abolish CB. Go ahead,
make everyone's day.

Too bad we can't petition them to abolish you, Lennie.

It might be done some time. It only took 24 years to make the first
dent in the 40m problem with SW BC interfering with the "rightful
ownership by hams" there.

And Amateurs will be enjoying that reduced interference even
while you are rotting in the nursing home, Lennie...

Steve, K4YZ