Cecil wrote,

Tdonaly wrote:
It won't work, Cecil. I quit arguing when you quit understanding.

And you would rather leave me ignorant than contribute anything
to my understanding. I certainly understand that. I have an
engineering degree and my IQ, according to MENSA, is in the
upper 1/2 of one percent. That you cannot post anything that
I can understand seems to be your problem, not mine. But don't
feel alone. My Southern Baptist Preacher has the identical
problem. His religion interferes with my understanding. Your
math model religion interferes with my understanding in exactly
the same way. Hint: If your math model doesn't predict reality,
it ain't worth much. The original assertion was that the current
into a coil is identical to the current out of a coil. Never mind
that the current has to travel faster than the speed of light to
make that true. Every measurement has proven that there is a
current taper through the coil. Yet, you maintain the original
assertion. There's something seriously wrong with a mind that
maintains concepts that have been proven wrong by measurements.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Boy, you sure have accused me of a lot of things I never knew I
did. I don't maintain any of that stuff. I don't even care. Furthermore,
I don't have any better idea than you do what the current distribution in
any individual coil is. I suppose it depends on its environment and its
physical description, but beyond that it means nothing to me. What I
was railing at you about was something entirely different: I simply don't
believe your theories explain what you say they do, and unless you
can give better evidence than you have, I don't see why anyone else
should believe them either. Period. That's it. The end. Kaput. Finis.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH
(P.S. You euchred me into responding this time but it won't happen again.)