View Single Post
  #376   Report Post  
Old November 18th 03, 09:26 AM
Ryan, KC8PMX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think what Jim was trying to say, that if a meal at Ma's diner averages
say for instance $5.50, (and a good meal too) and the corporate conglomerate
Taco Heaven is around $4.50 for instance, in some cases it is worthwhile
supporting the locally owned, Ma's place versus some criminally corporate
organization like Taco Heaven. Support the local business before supporting
the corporate ones.....

And if you find out that all the corporate ones have squeezed out the family
and/or locally owned ones, then what ever you have left is your own fault if
you didn't support the local ones.

Maybe I am wrong, but that's what I got out of Jim's message, and might not
have explained it the best. Myself? I believe in supporting the local
businessperson whenever and where ever I can FIRST, then supporting the
corporations when a locally owned option is not available. Granted there are
some exceptions to the rule, as for instance, gasoline. At least I research
to find out which ones are locally owned/franchised as opposed to true
corporately owned gas stations.


Screw Corporate Amerika! (before they screw you)



--
Ryan KC8PMX

"All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no
attention to criticism."

Exactly what I meant. If "Ma's Diner" isn't selling what I want then I'm
not going to buy regardless of small store, large chain or whatever. I
thought however the original post was Dwight's not yours. He seems to be
advocating that the government "fix" consumer's purchasing habits so that
the local stores stay in business.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE