On 20 Nov 2003 09:56:38 GMT, Alun wrote:


I am not sure you are entirely right, Paul. Where reciprocal agreements
are in place, someone with the stipulated class of licence will be able to
operate with the agreed priviledges, regardless of how they obtained the
licence (saving any nationality or residence restrictions, or limitations
on using a reciprocal licence to gain further reciprocal priviledges).

If the Morse test is abolished in one's own country, and you obtain a
licence without passing a code test, you will be able to operate HF in
countries that honour your licence under a reciprocal agreement, even if a
Morse test is still required in that country.

I hope you are right.

However, do you have any concrete examples about this ?

At least the IARU seems to be quite cautious in their statements:

http://www.iaru-r1.org/overseas-licences.html



CEPT 1/2

Once their licence no longer says class 1 or class 2, I assume they would
get class 1 priviledges, even if the national rules of where they are
going remain unchanged and there is still a Morse test there.

Based on my experience with the HAREC 12/5 WPM transition, I would be
quite sceptic about that, but if you have any observations, I would be
very interested to hear about them, so that I could inform hams
planning to go abroad.

Paul OH3LWR