View Single Post
  #34   Report Post  
Old November 30th 03, 12:14 PM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Alun wrote in message . ..
(N2EY) wrote in news:20031129115807.23307.00004755@mb-
m29.aol.com:

In article ,
(Brian) writes:

Blowhard libs have tried soooo hard to wreck this country.


So have blowhard conservatives.

They've nearly succeeded,


How is this country "wrecked", compared to how things used to be?

but there are still a few people who give a damn about America, and GW
is one of them.


There are lots of others, including many who disagree with Mr. Bush.

It's the methods, not the person.






Well, I'm a foreigner in your country, but you can't deny that the economy
boomed under Clinton and is now on it's knees.

I'm not fond of the present government, but mainly for other reasons.
Civil liberties and John Ashcroft, mostly.

All in all, I can't really think of anything GW Bush has done domestically
that is anything to shout about. Tax cuts for the rich. Deficit spending.
I'm really trying to think of anything good (honestly), but nothing comes
to mind.

As for the war, why open that can of worms? Yes, Saddam is/was a very bad
guy. Do I beleive the reasons given for going to war? No. And yes, Blair
went along with it, but I don't like him a lot either.

... but then I'm an anti-code test liberal, so what did you expect?

However, I actually do think it was a nice gesture for Dubbya to go to
Baghdad for Thanksgiving.

I'm sure this post will draw the usual 'love it or leave it' garbage from
at least someone, but never mind. I can take it.


Do you really believe that Clinton had anything to do with the
economy?

I think if Clinton had come in to office with the economy waning and a
terrorist attack around the corner he would have performed extremely
poorly.