View Single Post
  #155   Report Post  
Old December 4th 03, 10:37 AM
Kim W5TIT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , "Kim"
writes:


It's fine for them to go 20 mph above the speed limit. It's fine if they
want to go 30-40 mph above the speed limit. But, they won't find me

moving
out of their way; they'll have to go around because I am not moving into

a
lane where I have to slow down, or even get "stuck" there for a while, if
there happens to be more than one vehicle that wants to go past.


Ah, I see. The right lane is going 60-65, the left lane (with you in it by
yourself) is going 70-75, and you're not going to lose a few seconds in

order
to accomodate someone who wants to go 80-85.


It's not the matter of being kind and courteous and moving over so someone
who's acting like an idiot can go by. It's the principle of the matter that
*because* of the way they are being self-important, it's going to be *them*
that does the moving around. I.E., I see them in kind of like the "bully"
role of a little kid. Well, I'm not giving in to the bully.

This is an "every morning" thing. If they want to get to where they are
going quicker, then they need to adjust their scheduling, not make others

on
the road cater to their needs. I would not think of being obnoxious

because
I have to get somewhere quicker than anyone else--I would make the

decision
to get on the road earlier.

Sure.

Then why not apply that philosophy to yourself and get on the road early

enough
that the right lane gets you there on time?

Suppose you're sailing along on your 60 mph 4-lane-divided (2 lanes
each way) road and you come across two (non police) cars side-by-side
going exactly the speed limit.

What would you do? Would their behavior bother you?


Yes, their behavior would bother me--*but* they're the cops...


No, they're not!

I wrote: " two (non police) cars". Sorry if that wasn't clear!


Whoops, yeah, I missed that. You were clear.


What I meant was two ordinary drivers in ordinary vehicles - not police or
officials of any kind. Just two folks who decided to go the posted speed

limit
and no faster.

What would you do?


Regardless of who it is that is driving, I don't act like an idiot to them,
around them, about them, or anything. I would pace myself at my comfort
zone behind them--6, 7, or more carglengths, and cruise with them.


Then they should have gotten out earlier than me.


Why should *they* move to accomodate *you*? *You* won't accomodate them!


Yeah, I suppose...but my justification is that they can accommodate
themselves, by moving around. A) We are both speeding; B) At the point this
person is behind me wanting me to move over so he/she can get by, it's a
given that it's because we're both around a driver(s) in the right lane that
are going slower, right? So, what is it about the driver behind
me...practically shoving their hood up under my vehicle...that would compel
me to slow down, move over, reposition myself, when all they have to do is
allow *both* of us to keep speeding, i.e., stay above a speed limit we don't
want to drive, and wait the bit of time it will take to get passed the
"slower" traffic?

It's the same principle
as someone who's standing in the "fast" lane (misnomer most of the
time--GRIN) at the grocery store and I am ahead of them with 10 items and
they only have one or two. If they're prone to it, they'll tap their

foot;
sigh real loud, etc. Practically fall over trying to get me to notice

that
they only have "just this little bit." And, how dare I *not* yield to

them
and let them go ahead...and the next with one or two...and the next, etc.


Must be another regional thing - I've never encountered that around here.

Hey, next time, get there before me.


Different situation and principle.


I think the priniciple is the same. The root of my angst toward the driver
we are speaking of, is their attitude. The attitude that has them convinced
that they need to speed faster than someone else. Or that where they are
going is far more important than where I am going (when neither of us has
that information available to us).


In my case, my 70-75 mph (more near 70 most of the time) is probably more
due to the fact that, that is where my foot lands on the gas pedal.


?? "Where your foot lands"?

Two words: Cruise control.


Yeah. I thought when I got my truck with that on it, that I would always be
using it. I don't like it...don't know where to put my foot that I can
still have the same tactile feel with the brake pedal and gas pedal in
alignment with my placement of the foot. I don't feel "safe" with cruise
control engaged--plus the speeds of drivers is so erradic that one must keep
disengaging and reengaging it anyway. Never fails...set it to the flow of
traffic and 5-6 miles down the road, set it again.


I should probably count my blessings here, because this will jinx me.

I've
been stopped three times in my driving "career." Little enough that I

still
don't "know the routine" when I do get stopped. Only once I've been
ticketed


I wonder why....;-)


Once when I was speeding. And, by all rights that cop should have nailed
me. It was 11:30 at night, and my registration sticker (of which the new
one was at home) was out, inspection sticker was out--which I'd not paid any
attention to, *and* I couldn't find my insurance card. But, he let me go!
WOW!

and that was for taking a turn onto a street that doesn't allow
those turns at the time of morning I was doing it.


About 20 years ago, on a cold rainy Sunday night, I made a wrong turn onto

a
one way street in Philly. No "One Way" sign at the intersection, no "No

Right
Turn", just a stop sign. No cars on the street either.

Of course it didn't take long after the turn to realize something wasn't

right,
so I did a quick three-point turn. But it wasn't quick enough to avoid the
notice of two of Philadelphia's finest, who turned on the lights and

pulled me
over.

By the time he got to my car I had the license, registration and insurance

card
out, both hands on the wheel, and the window down so he could talk to me.

He took my papers and proceeded to run them through the computer in his

patrol
car.

Meanwhile, the young lady who was with me started giving me the third

degree as
to how I was going to handle the cop, how it wasn't my fault, how I should

"be
a man" and "stand up to him" and "talk my way out of it". I held up one

hand
and said "Be quiet. I'm the driver, it's my car and my license, and I

don't
argue with the police over something as minor as a ticket. That's what

traffic
court is for."

Officer came back, asked if I knew why he stopped me. I said "I was going

the
wrong way on a one-way street because there's no sign at the intersection

with
Pine Street. I turned around as soon as I realized it was a one-way

street, but
you were right to stop me and I can understand if you decide to give me a
ticket."

Officer handed me back my papers and said: "No ticket for you, your papers

are
all in order. We know all about the sign. Just be careful."

The young lady kept quiet, which was quite a miracle.

IOW, he was just waiting for somebody to give him a hard time.


Uh, I have a problem with cops in general. Most I've encountered are not
friendly. However, most I've encountered in a casual setting are great
guys/gals. I don't like the military form of communication--stern,
expressionless, etc., and it puts me on edge.


If they are going the speed limit where I am at (in the left lane), I'd
still calmly make the move to the right lane and go around them--when it

was
safe to--and wouldn't act like an idiot to them.


What if there was another car on the right and you couldn't go around?


Same as the non police (grin) scenario you gave me. I'd pace myself and
cruise. I also don't care or get all upset about traffic jams. I look at
them as an example to notice the birds flying around, look up under the
bridges to see if there's a poor homeless person up under there, look at all
the beauty I usually don't get to pay a whole lot of attention to--in fact
the traffic jam gives me the opportunity to find some sense of pleasantry in
places that really do require "closer inspection" to find it...(grin)

It is not any more "right"
for me to speed than the next person--it's just that they'd better decide

to
go around, because I will not be moving for them just because they are

going
to act like an idiot. I will move if I decide to...and I usually don't.
But it's just as OK for them to be speeding as me...I don't care. You

seem
to be stuck on the idea that I think they are wrong to speed faster than

I
speed.


Nope.

I'm stuck on the idea that you want to control the speed on the road.


Hmmm. You see it as me wanting to control the speed, I only think of it as
not giving in to the way I perceive someone to be acting.


Yep. And it's mine...(grin)

HAW!

I do believe some of all this is regional, however.

And I've done a few tricks myself....

Way back in the late '80s, I had reason to go back and forth between
Philly and Washington, DC about every other weekend. I noticed that
the aggressiveness of drivers increased in direct proportion to
proximity to the nation's capital.

The worst part of the run was the BWP (Baltimore Washington Parkway),
a no-trucks 4 lane road with trees on both sides, and also between the
northbound and southbound lanes. Lots of traffic on a Friday night,
and as one approached The District the cars got more expensive and the
drivers more aggressive.


Heh, heh...funny you should mention that.


It happened way too many times.


Sir, this is "Dallas" Texas, where arrogance and extravagance are not rare
things... BUT, I gotta say, I've never, ever seen a stretch limo or
"driven" car acting like that...they are generally over in the right lane!
This discussion just made me realize that, I think.


Back then the limit was 55 and traffic tended to stay below about 59
because enforcement was pretty good, and there were lots of places for
the troopers to hide in the trees, around curves, etc. The troopers
would not go after anyone below about 62 because speedometers and
radar are not 100% accurate. Above that they were ruthless, and above
65 the fines went up and up and up...

I got to know their whereabouts pretty good by observing where others
got tickets. (I was *never* stopped, in part because my 1980 Rabbit
Diesel looked like it couldn't even go the speed limit anyway). Radar
detectors were illegal in MD back then, too, and they'd do things like
set up a radar gun on an overpass and watch whose brake lights came on
for no reason....

One night I'm sailing down the BWP in the *right* lane, and up behind
me comes a new Saab (Saabs were the hot car back then among the
yuppie-but-no-Beemer crowd). Dude flashes his brights at me - he wants
*me* to get in the *left* lane so he can pass without having to change
lanes!

So I ease up on the throttle and slow down to 53...52....51....

He gets ticked and crawls up but now I'm down to 50...49...

Flashes the brights, gets ticked, and I keep easing up....

Finally he gets ticked and goes into the left lane. Whereupon I start
speeding up again...52...55...58...62...

He pulls alongside and now is really steamed because it is taking far
more effort to get past me than he expected. So he drops down a gear
and stomps it and goes off in a cloud of dust, over the next rise and
around the curve.....

and I bring it back down to the limit...

and I wave as I go by him, because he's now stopped by a trooper for
going WAY over the limit.....


Oh, I forgot to add when you originally noted this story...I toot and wave!


I wouldn't play games like that today, though...

73 de Jim, N2EY


Yeah, that was what I did a few...OK, more than a few...years ago. I'd
always do just that, as a matter of fact. BUT, one day, this guy began
throwing things out his window at me when I did finally move over and let
him go passed me! Scared the heck outta me...he was throwing anything

loose
in his car, bottle caps, cracker jack box, etc. Thank goodness he didn't
come across the bottle!


Or the gun.


Yeah, for sure


That's another reason I'm not so sure about letting
creepy people get ahead of me...it may be me having to come upon them

once
again...

Better than having them behind you...

73 de Jim, N2EY


To each his own...unless they're acting like an idiot

Kim W5TIT