Art Unwin KB9MZ wrote:
Seems like the model is lacking in all the details
and frankly I feel I am looking at an intentianal sham for some reason

Sorry you feel that way, Art. That is the output graphic from EZNEC.

For instance you do not show coupling to ground which is why I am suspicious
since resonance is unavoidably affected by nearby objects as well as ground

If there's something wrong, blame EZNEC. I am just reporting what
EZNEC sez.

You also have not specified a frequency of use ...

Of course I have, Art, it's in the .ez file. Since antennas are scalable,
the frequency is irrelevant to the diagram. Please download the .ez file.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----