Thread
:
Why You Don't Like The ARRL
View Single Post
#
162
December 17th 03, 05:25 PM
Steve Robeson, K4CAP
Posts: n/a
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
Yes you are. Your beligerance keeps on.
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...LHA
Yup, beligerance with flags and banners waving...
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...LHA
Klunk, you are indeed weird as well as beligerant to
say that amateur radio is somehow so "unique" that it
is totally different from all other radio!
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...LHA
The physics of amateur radio is the SAME as the physics
of all other radio.
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...LHA
The jargon, patois, colloquialisms of amateur radio
communicating MIGHT be considered "different" than all
other radio services, but that is as easily picked up by
anyone going from one lodge hall to another. 10-4?
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...LHA
He wants morse testing ended.
Yes.
Based on what special knowledge and background?
Based on 50 1/2 years of radio communications without
ever needing it or having to know it to "work HF."
Based on absolutely ZERO experience in Amateur Radio.
Based on four decades of direct design engineering for
communications which considers ALL available modes.
Based on absolutely ZERO experience in Amateur Radio.
Based on knowing the literature and history of ALL
radio communications, not the limited spoon-feeding
of knowledge from amateur fraternal organizations.
["Shannon's Law" was based on teleprinter signals,
not morse code and that Law became public in 1948
and accepted by the entire world of radio]
Based on absolutely ZERO experience in Amateur Radio.
Based on the same bull**** heard for six decades
from elitist morsemen who still think that standards
and practices are the "same" as in the 1930s.
So far, Leonard H. Anderson, a person not licensed in ANY radio
service, is the only person suggesting that we "think that standards
and practices are the "same" as the 1930's.
(And more profanity from the ALLEGED professional.)
This is because he's extremely ignorant of the facts and arrogant
IN his ignorance.
Based on what the FCC said publicly in 1990 and
again in 1999 that a morse code test is not necessary
for them to grant any amateur radio license.
Based on absolutely ZERO experience in Amateur Radio.
He wants a minimum age for amateur radio licensing.
Yes, but I don't make near the BIG THING you try
to make of it in here, Klunk. I said that on the public
record on NPRM 98-143 in January 1999 and
haven't pursued it since.
Based on absolutely ZERO experience in Amateur Radio. And I
might add absolutely ZERO experience in child rearing or participation
in ANY organization or activity that might justify his opinion.
Based on what special knowledge and background?
Show us your certificates and pretty paper saying you
are the EXPERT in everything you pontificate on.
He's licensed. He's EXPERIENCED in the Amateur Radio Service.
Lennie the Liar is not.
His right to direct his opinion to his government is intact.
Damn right it is, Herr Robust.
More profanity from the "professional".
Government is not forced to agree with his
assessment of how amateur radio should be changed.
Who, besides your gloriousness and nobility, said
it should?
You have, Lennie. You have repeatedly placed yourself above just
about anyone who might express an opinion on radio matters, including
what the FCC should "think".
[let us know the date of your coronation so that we
may genuflect and worship your presence...]
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...LHA
I'm certainly not
forced to agree with his views, to respect his views or to refrain from
sarcasm with regard to his views.
You are beligerant and ****ed off that anyone DARES
challenge your arrogance about What Should Be!
Kinda like you, Lennie? Except HE has the credentials to back up
his play.
You don't.
Wanting to be involved does not make
Len other than a bystander in the world of amateur radio.
Herr Robust forgets that amateur radio licensing is NOT
dictated by a members-only club. Not in the USA...
And it STILL does not change the fact that his assertion is
absolutely true.
Sorry for you.
He is not a
part of amateur radio simply because he comments to government or
because he posts here.
Neither is this newsgroup some kind of "ARRL South."
Why should it be? Dave lives NORTH of the Mason-Dixon line.
Likewise, I
saw nothing in rules of this newsgroup which would restrict the
participation of non-Amateurs.
Len has participated and participated and participated.
Herr Robust has arrogantly proclaimed and issued orders
and done the whole nine yards of the KH2D bit...on and
on and on and on and on...
Yet another lie from the desk of leonard H. Anderson.
Sir Scummy is asked to cite the post in which Dave issued any
"orders".
He wants to
participate and to prevent others from laughing at him or his ideas.
Poor baby, reflections of your own golden eye scowling at
remarks you receive?
Herr Robust, I was on Usenet before the Internet went
public and am very, very familiar with what goes on,
and the inhabitants' attitudes in the cyberspace of
computer-modem communications...for more than
two decades.
Obviously yet another lie, or Sir Putzalot would not make so many
"mistakes", including "missent" e mails, misrepresentations of his
identity via multiple screen names, etc etc etc.
The arrogant - such as yourself - HATE the comebacks
you get poking holes in your mighty balloons. Ergo,
you try the "reversal" bit and say that the hole-poker is
"afraid of being laughed at." Tsk, tsk, tsk.
So far all you have done is call Dave Heil names, Lennie. You've
not "poked holes" in anything, least of all anything he's had to say.
On the otherhand YOU have been caught lying so many times that
you make Jon Lovitz's "SNL" character look like a paragon of
virtue...Morgan Fairchild included...
EVERYONE takes a chance on posting something in
public. EVERYONE has to "take" what comes back
to them...or leave. That includes arrogant Waffle-SS
colonels.
Including you...or should I say ESPEICALLY you, Lennie?
Others are free to participate and may form their own opinions of LHA's
ideas. They are free to laugh at his ideas, to poke fun of his ideas
and to counter his ideas.
AND AGREE WITH LHA's postings.
Like Brian Burke, the guy who can't provide us with the identity
of a single QSO allegedly made from Somalia...?!?!
Or Vipul Shah...The guy who (like Lennie) CLAIMS to be an
electrical engineer, then changes jobs because his family disaproves
of his job...Yeah...I can see how being a "professional" in an
honorable profession could be a black mark on the old family tree...
And of course we have "MegHz" and a litany of other "anonymous"
posters who leap to Lennie's defense, only to leap right back in to
obscurity.
Now doesn't that just completely fry your psyche?
If it were true, it might. But even the folks who express the
same sentiments as you (save for the above mentioned fools) don't want
to be even remotely associated with you.
Do you know why?
However, your ego needs to have you completely in
control so you've gone into a fantasyland where you
are Supreme Commander who Knows Truth!
Dig into Mama Lennie's correspondence books, Lennie...Look up
"paranoia" and what symptoms and behaviour manifest with it...
You may not like what Len has to say, but the
lack of a Ham license alone should not diminish it or dismiss it.
There's no "may" involved. I don't like what Len has to say and don't
care for his windy, pontificating and condescending posts.
All the readers have "noticed" your opinion...
As we have yours...along with your LACK of practical experience
in the Amateur Radio Service to back it up.
If you've
read Len's stuff, you'll have no difficulty in understanding that his
lack of an amateur license is not the only reason for making light of
his opinions regarding amateur radio licensing.
The Supreme Commander has spoken!
And it's the truth...Whether you care to accept it or not.
There is NO First Amendment in regards to ham radio
regulations!
The First Amendment bars the GOVERNMENT from infringing on Free
Speech...I thought you would ahve learned that somewhere in the 14
eyars of night school you alleged to ahve completed.
All amateur licensing regulations are handled STRICTLY
by the existing amateur licensees!
Supreme Commanders don't give a damn about
anyone who doesn't agree with his arrogant
pontificating orders of the day!
Sick transit, gloria mundi...
Didn't ahve the "nads" to sign your post again, I see, Lennie.
PUTZ!
Steve, K4YZ
Reply With Quote
