View Single Post
  #30   Report Post  
Old December 20th 03, 02:26 AM
Carl R. Stevenson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
om...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message

...
"Phil Kane" wrote in message
et...
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:12:40 -0000, Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

QST has gotten better, with the dropping of a lot of the contest data
and more focus on a range of articles from beginner to expert level.
I'd like to see more technical focus on modern stuff and fewer
articles on building regen receivers with tubes, though.

Yeah, Nuvistors are getting hard to get.


And even half-a**ed decent transistors can blow their performance away,
with better ones being worlds better.


The most recent construction article in QST using Nuvistors was when?


Ask Phil, he's the one who mentioned them :-) Seriously, I think it was in
the
60's ... but I don't think tube projects have much relevance any more,
except,
perhaps for amplifiers, and you know how I feel about QRO ...

How many of the "frequent poster" club here read them when they
first came out or even some time later?


I did. And almost every other QST article since - well, you don't
really want to know how far back....

I don't recall them by title, but I probably read them ... my high

school
had an extensive collection of QSTs and I spend most of my study hall
time signed out to the library reading QST ... I think I'd read every

copy
they had in the collection by the time I graduated in 1967.

How far back did they go?


I honestly don't remember ... but well back into the 50's IIRC.

73,
Carl - wk3c