"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ...
"Brian" wrote in message
om...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message
...
"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In no particular order:
1) Representation of amateur radio (what other organization or
individual
would
do anyhting like the 121 page commentary on BPL?)
Representation of what the Board *perceives* to be the wishes of the
membership.
I don't believe that non-members get the same attention on issues as
members, but
that is reasonable, since member dues support the ARRL.
This member supports the ARRL. Also, this member did not receive a
questionare when the ARRL was conducting a poll of members and
non-members.
Perhaps they did a random survey of some percentage of the membership?
I'm sure they did - one thing that they probably did right. But they
also officially polled non-members.
5) Elected officials (they listen even if they don't agree)
YMMV, depending on what area you live in, whether your Director is
open-minded and progressive, etc.
Apparently they think that they cannot present the needs or want of
both camps until they come to a concensus.
The "c-word" is an excuse to do nothing. On some things there may
never be consensus - should the ARRL do nothing? Leadership is
when one has the courage and wisdom to make a sound judgement
and then "do the right thing."
Its tough being a leader. You can never make everyone happy. But
doing nothing is likely to **** everyone off.
Otherwise, they could just do a web vote
popularity contest on every issue and wouldn't need Directors ... the
staff could handle the whole thing ...
They probably are handling it. ;^)
6) W1AW (been there and operated the station, too)
I have mixed views on the value of W1AW ... a good museum to "the Old
Man,"
but perhaps its services could be provided by alternative means at lower
operating cost.
Commercial gear? Why?
Perhaps you misunderstand ... first, W1AW is running commercial gear (and
has for
many years). I believe the current main transmitters are super-commercial
gear from
Harris Corp., if memory serves me correctly, suplimented by some other
commercial
gear donated by some or all of "the big 4" ham equipment mfgrs.
I've use Harris gear in the service.
How about a prolonged lab test on real amateur gear? Or are the
operations at W1AW really too severe for amateur gear?
What I was referring to were things like CW practice, bulletins, etc. All
of that could
be provided (and much is) by the web site, and probably would reduce
operating
costs. (Though doing things by non-radio means is heresy to some ...)
I honestly have no problem with the transmissions. Perhaps W1MAN
could contact with the ARRL to put out his bulletins and stop the
duplicity.
Carl, you should see the NCI bashing being done by Dee and Jim on the
other ARRL thread.
I have been on business travel to the ITU in Geneva for two weeks and to New
Orleans for a week of meetings and haven't been keeping up.
Perhaps I was a bit rash in that statement.
Let them bash ... NCI continues to gain new members (and the pace picked up
quite dramatically with all of the publicity surrounding the Petitions
before the
FCC); the membership is, judging by the large number of e-mails I get, happy
with our policies and actions and ready to continue to support NCI through
the
end-game;
They needed an alternative to the status-quo.
and our detractors still haven't presented the FCC with a single
rational,
valid, compelling reason to keep any Morse testing ...
Aaron Jones was keeping the list of Morse Myths, and he's been silent
for a couple of years. There must be nothing new to debunk.
73,
Carl - wk3c
73, Brian/N0iMD
|