In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:

"Mike Coslo" wrote:

My guess on the debate of the future
is one of testing regimen. I predict that
a new movement will arise that views
testing per se as an unnecessary nuisance,
and will agitate for simplification of the test,
and eventually it's removal.


I don't think so, Mike. While I do see comments here and there, I don't
see a growing consensus for a need to change the written tests, much less a
growing consensus on any specific change to those tests.

Don't need a consensus. Just somebody or somebodys with an agenda. Like NCVEC's
Gang of Four.

I suspect the vast
majority would agree those tests are needed and are just fine as they are.

Sure - just like the vast majority might say that a single 5 wpm code test is
needed and is just fine it is.

Instead, I hope we can finally focus on more fully using the frequencies we
have.

How?

What changes do you suggest to make that happen?

And what does "more fully" mean in that context?

Of course, I don't see any growing consensus for that either, but one
can hope.

Don't need a consensus...

73 de Jim, N2EY