Thread
:
Why You Don't Like The ARRL
View Single Post
#
217
December 20th 03, 09:13 PM
Len Over 21
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(N2EY)
writes:
In article . net, "Dwight
Stewart" writes:
"Mike Coslo" wrote:
My guess on the debate of the future
is one of testing regimen. I predict that
a new movement will arise that views
testing per se as an unnecessary nuisance,
and will agitate for simplification of the test,
and eventually it's removal.
I don't think so, Mike. While I do see comments here and there, I don't
see a growing consensus for a need to change the written tests, much less a
growing consensus on any specific change to those tests.
Don't need a consensus. Just somebody or somebodys with an agenda. Like
NCVEC's Gang of Four.
Obviously a Gang of running-dog imperialists!
I suspect the vast
majority would agree those tests are needed and are just fine as they are.
Sure - just like the vast majority might say that a single 5 wpm code test is
needed and is just fine it is.
You think it and the "vast majority" agrees automatically.
Marvelous this god-hood thing...
Of course, I don't see any growing consensus for that either, but one
can hope.
Don't need a consensus...
None at all. Everyone do as you say, following the True Beliefs
of the Church of St. Hiram.
As long as everyone thinks like you do, all is serene, safe,
secure. No dissension, no arguments, all big happy family.
Morse code makes every ham happy.
Ohm mane padme ohm...
Let there be no resistance. Resistance is futile.
LHA
Reply With Quote