"JJ" wrote in message
...
Dwight Stewart wrote:



In general, you're right. Nobody is supposed to break the speed limit,
so
laws about slower vehicles moving to the right and not impeding the flow
of
traffic don't defend the speeder's actions. But, by the same token,
slower
drivers are supposed to move to the right and not impede the flow of
traffic
(if those are the laws in your state), so someone speeding doesn't
defend
the actions of the slower driver who is impeding the flow of traffic
either.
I know that sounds strange, but there is some logic behind it. On
multiple
lane highways, congestion (cars bunching too closely together) is one of
the
most common causes of accidents. And congestion is dangerious at all
highway
speeds, but even more so when drivers are speeding. To prevent that
bunching
up, many states have adopted laws to encourage slower drivers to move to
the
right so faster vehicles can proceed without bunching up behind the
slower
vehicle. The idea is to keep all vehicles flowing smoothly - yes, even
if
some are speeding.

W5TWIT wants to play citizen traffic cop, it isn't for her to decide if
someone is going to fast and make them slow down by staying in the left
lane (even though she is exceeding the speed limit herself), she is
obliged to move over and let the faster traffic pass. It is up to the
authorities to take care of the speeder.


From the description, it is the person coming up behind that is trying to
disrupt the flow of traffic as Kim stated that she was going the same speed
as the traffic ahead of her. The person coming up behind would be then
trying to force a whole stream of cars one after another to move over for
him/her.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE