View Single Post
  #204   Report Post  
Old December 22nd 03, 03:32 AM
JJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JJ wrote:

Dee D. Flint wrote:

"JJ" wrote in message
...

Dwight Stewart wrote:



In general, you're right. Nobody is supposed to break the speed limit,



so

laws about slower vehicles moving to the right and not impeding the
flow



of

traffic don't defend the speeder's actions. But, by the same token,



slower

drivers are supposed to move to the right and not impede the flow of



traffic

(if those are the laws in your state), so someone speeding doesn't



defend

the actions of the slower driver who is impeding the flow of traffic



either.

I know that sounds strange, but there is some logic behind it. On



multiple

lane highways, congestion (cars bunching too closely together) is
one of



the

most common causes of accidents. And congestion is dangerious at all



highway

speeds, but even more so when drivers are speeding. To prevent that



bunching

up, many states have adopted laws to encourage slower drivers to
move to



the

right so faster vehicles can proceed without bunching up behind the



slower

vehicle. The idea is to keep all vehicles flowing smoothly - yes, even



if

some are speeding.


W5TWIT wants to play citizen traffic cop, it isn't for her to decide if
someone is going to fast and make them slow down by staying in the left
lane (even though she is exceeding the speed limit herself), she is
obliged to move over and let the faster traffic pass. It is up to the
authorities to take care of the speeder.



From the description, it is the person coming up behind that is trying to
disrupt the flow of traffic as Kim stated that she was going the same
speed
as the traffic ahead of her. The person coming up behind would be then
trying to force a whole stream of cars one after another to move over for
him/her.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


I fail to see what is so hard to understand about the law...slower
traffic stays to the right. It really is very simple.


Until 1977 the road signs in Texas read, "SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT",
those signs are being replaced with "LEFT LANE FOR PASSING ONLY". How
much clearer than that can it be? Even Kim should be able to grasp the
concept of that.
It is all spelled out in the Star Telegram article.