"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
t...
KØHB wrote:

"Bill Sohl" wrote


BUT, his NCI membership doesn't tie NCI to Han's personal support
for an entry level license.

Are you saying that NCI does not reciprocate my support for their goals?
That would certainly be a strange sort of membership-organization.

Sorry Hans! Only elimination of the Test!

Essentually correct. NCI doesn't take positions on the wider
scope of testing and opinions held by any individual member.
Indeed, one could readily see where two members might have totally
opposite opinions on written testing.

And that is what bothers me about NCI.

Why that bothers anyone makes no sense to me. Indeed, we are
damned if we do, damn;ed if we don't. We formed as a "one issue"
organization and now some folks are bothered by that...strange,
truly strange.

But it is a great way to dodge responsibility! 8^)

Dodge responsibilities? So exactly what does that mean?
What specific "responsibility" is NCI dodging?
Did I miss some unstated responsibility of NCI and/or any
other ham club or organization?

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK