Excellent question!

73, Leo

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:21:02 -0600, "Kim W5TIT"
wrote:

"Leo" wrote in message
.. .
Unfortunately, it's very unlikely that the ARRL would publish this
list (and it's excellent humour!) withour some serious re-editing...-
QST is a pretty - um, formal - magazine.

But they should - Definitely first-class material!

73, Leo

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:21:00 -0600, "Kim W5TIT"
wrote:

Alex? You really, really should send this in to the ARRL for submission
to
QST. I'd leave the "taking a healthy dump" part out, though!

Kim W5TIT


Hmmm, well. Does that mean that if anyone of the "seriously needs editing"
callsigns wrote something in to QST that, no matter how technical, pertinent
or informative the item might be, it would not get published?

Hmmm,

Kim W5TIT :-o