View Single Post
  #46   Report Post  
Old January 19th 04, 05:01 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Brian Kelly) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , Dave Heil
writes:

N2EY wrote:


The newer
computers actually seem to keep worse time than the older ones...


Not an issue. When the 'puter clock here is noticeably off time vs.
WWV I simply ping NIST and let them reset it. My tax dollars at work.
YMMV.

http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq...-computer.html


KEWL!

Of course there are also clocks an watches that "listen" to WWVB
and reset themselves as needed.

But my Tymeter grinds on, flipping the drums.


. . groan . . !


It works! The battery-operated clock above it in the pictures (you
saw my shack pix, I presume) is the backup and local timekeeper.
The Tymeter just keeps doing its job. Simple technology - watta
concept.

Every so often I tune in WWV on the '342 just for a check. Usually
the Tymeter is dead on.

Did I ever show ya the pix of my trip to Boulder NIST and Fort
Collins?
A few years back - got shots of the then-standard atomic clocks and
the transmitter site. Plus me standing by the transmitter site sign.

73 de Jim, N2EY