RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 20th 04, 12:20 PM

(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article ,
(Stebe Robeson, still in the throes of PMS (Powerful Marine Syndrome) writes:

(Lennie exhibits yet again his "accuse OTHERS of "character
assassination, then deny, deny, deny...)

And I do not spit on "professionalism" Lennie.

Of course you do. Everyone has seen it in this free, open,
unmoderated forum.

What YOU represent is not what anyone that I know calls
"professionalism".

You have the tools to make a difference in Amateur Radio, yet
your only action is to antagonize, humiliate and insult in this forum.

Hardly "professional" in ANYone's definition.

You "knew everything about electronics engineering" after working
less than a year as a purchasing agent in a company making
set-top boxes and modems.

You will, of course, provide the reference for the "quote" you
just cited?

You've consistantly tried to equate college night courses with some
kind of alliterative low-grade "night school."

No, Lennie, YOU have demonstrated that it's some kind of
allitaritive low-grade "night school" by your assertion of
"professionalism" and subsequent conduct herein.

You've consistantly said I was a mere "bench technician" rather
than a design engineer...yet you've never tried to check with any of
the past employers I've listed nor contacted any of the U.S. radio
amateurs I've listed as references.

I have yet to find any product in my home or in MY profession
that has your hand in it, Lennie.

And discussions with people who knew you placed your
"contributions" at teh bench technician level...I just picked up on
it.

That assertion is yet ANOTHER lie from somone whio finds it EASY
to lie. I have nothing but the highest regard for professionals in ANY
field...It's just that I have absolutely ZERO respect for YOU since
you've made such a mockery of the title.

"Mockery?" From the expert Dill Instructor with hardly any work
experience in ANY engineering?

This forum is NOT about "engineering", Your Scumminess. It's
about Amateur Radio.

Tsk, tsk, tsk...all you do is vent hatred and bile against another
because that is your nature in here...always insulting the person
who has opinions rather than tackling the subject matter...and,
when there is no possibility of a valid response to the subject, just
more heaping of insults against a person.

The "opinions" you express are as received as equally injurous as
YOU receive against you.

The only problem is that you seem to think you are the only one
with a valid opinion. THAT makes you arrogant.

As for "going on 84", I will gladly jog around the block a few
times with you or see how well you do carrying a full field pack on
the rescue team. NOW who is involved in another "ploy of pervase
character assassination"...?!?!

Tsk, tsk, tsk...Stebe reacting as if He were the only one mentioned.

Well, Lennie...YOU said "48 going on 84"...

To WHOM were you refering?

And I will STILL mount up taht pack and take a jog around the
block with you...You also accused me of being "pudgy", yet evidence to
the contrary ahs been presented.

More of that Andersonian "character assassination" going on, I
see...

Unless Stebe moved (again?), He does not live in Pennsylvania
nor is he a renowned amateur historian.

I need to live in Pennsylvania or be a historian to make a fool
out of you...?!?!

I don't THINK so!

Since YOU seem to be the only one who deems it important to
interject arguments about Morse Code into threads that don't even
adress it, I'd say the fixation is yours, Oh Putzy One.

Absolutely. I interject comments about the beloved smartness of
the morse code test at any opportunity.

And when the thread is NOT about Morse Code, that makes you a
troll.

Contrary to your personal (weird) beliefs, just getting into U.S.
amateur radio on HF allocations requires a morse test. [see subject
title "A Newbies View On Things"]

Sorry, Scummy One...

FEDERAL LAW requires that one know Morse Code to have access to
the Amateur HF allocations. This was based upon international
convention which has since been changed. The United States Government
is presently in the public comment phase of chainging that
requirement.

My only "belief" is that one should comply with the law as it
exists while it exisits.

You seem to think selective law compliance is OK.

Some of us desire to change the amateur regulations and eliminate
the morse code test. Being a "member of the amateur community"
through licensing is not required to change federal laws [see the
U.S. Constitution in regard to who may communicate with their
government].

Then communicate with them. Your presence and practice here is
antagonistic and argumentitive. You long ago lost any initiative on
your "opinions" when you started in on individuals.

All amateur learning STOPS after achieving Extra in Stebe's World.

If that's what you think, Lennie, and that's what you NEED to
believe in order to sleep at night, well, who am I to deny you a good
night's sleep. That it's not true is inconsequential to YOUR needs....

Steve, K4YZ