RadioBanter - View Single Post - We Need a BANDWIDTH-BASED Frequency Plan - NOT Mode-Based.

February 5th 04, 08:00 PM

In article , Dave Heil Fibber
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Dave Heil male impersonator
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article ,

(Brian Kelly) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Brian Kelly) writes:

I have yet to see or hear of a single example of a nocode
experimenting with a new wide mode. For that matter none of the
Extra
"wideband digigeeks"who have bleated the same refrain have done
anything but talk either.

Is PSK31 chopped liver? :-)

When did a 31 Hz wide mode become "wideband"?

Martinez' innovation comes from scaling current wideband data
communications at high rates to the slow, real-time rates of
amateur radio environments. That involved some good application
of Information Theory and other things, not in being spoon-fed
How To Do It from the pages of QST.

I noted that you didn't really provide an answer to the question.

The question was ambiguous and did not define "wide."

Your name isn't "Kelly," sweetums. Ya gotta live near philly, eat
hoagies and buy "gaz" for da car in order to impersonate Kelly.

Got that?

I've had it all along.

We know. You are incurable.

Some Tums would ease your gaz pains.

You wouldn't know Martinez if he had a leather suit instead of scales.

Really? I beg to differ. At any rate, how would you be in a position
to know what I know?

Extras shouldn't beg. That's unseemly.

ANYONE'S "in a position to know" you don't know, snarly dave.

Four neurons can't hold more than 16 bits of data.

Hello? Ever hear of Shannon's Law and the relationship of data rate
versus bandwidth? It's fairly simple math and proportional. That
means it can be SCALED as in relationship of numbers.

That is simply more misdirection on your part.

Hokay...the entire rest of the radio world is familiar with Shannon's
Law and the mathematical relationship of bandwidth, noise,
information rate, and probability of error. They agree it is correct.

But, as an amateur you disagree, calling it "misdirection."

You need more than four neurons, senior alzheimer. Download some
from Ten-Tec and improve your cognitive capability.

Tell us about the new wideband modes.

Why? You are an amateur keeping alive the Living Museum of
Archaic Radio and imagining you are in a Star Trek universe with
matter transporters.

On-off carrier keying is the limit of your profound radio knowledge.

We can't disappoint you with reality of the rest of the radio world.
You are a proud and noble amateur, better than all professionals.

Hail Ceasar and all the other salads...

You don't seem to be able to
address the question about wideband modes.

It is at 79 Wistfull Vista.

McGee, don't open that closet again... ... ... ... too late!

LHA / WMD