View Single Post
  #65   Report Post  
Old February 7th 04, 04:15 PM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(William) wrote in message . com...
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
N2EY wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Carl will be very upset you put *this* idea in people minds too! ;^)


Carl has expressed his disdain for the concept of skilled radio operators here.
Look up some of his posts under his old call (WA6VSE) and phrases such as
"electronic paintball wars" "stomp into the dust" "wetware modem" "emulate a
modem" "better modes and modulations"....




I wonder where Carl is lately? Haven't heard from him since he had the
change of heart regarding the testing.

- Mike KB3EIA -



Mike, speaking of a change of heart testing, check this out:

--------------------
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com...
(N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:
Morse Code endorsement required for opera-
tion in lower 100kHz of any band.

Bad idea. Acts as a disincentive to use CW and digital modes, and as an
incentive to use voice only!

Ahem, The Amateur Formerly Known As Rev. Jim, we've had that very same
or greater disincentive since 1912.

Why is it NOW a problem?

---------------------

Almost makes you want to think!


Like I said, almost.

bb