On 08 Feb 2004 20:19:54 GMT, (N2EY) wrote:

In article , ospam
(Larry Roll K3LT) writes:

In article , Leo

writes:


An article in today's Toronto Star, which covers our amusement with
the Janet Jackson issue pretty well! Double standards abound......


http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...star/Layout/Ar
ticle_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&c id=1076022610517


Leo:

I don't even have to bother to read it. I'm guessing it says that all of us
hyper-conservative, redneck UhmurriKans are so backwardly non-progressive
in our morality that we're shocked and outraged by the little act put on
during Super Bowl XXXVIII by Jackson and Timberlake. Yada, yada,
yada.

No, it's not like that at all, Larry. You should read it, because it's a
perfect
example of a bunch of good facts connected by a bit of muddle-headed
illogic.

It was pretty accurate and intelligently written, actually! But I
assume from your statement that it didn't agree with your own
viewpoint, as it too is "wrong".

I take it you're not a Robbie Burns fan:

"Oh wad some power the giftie gie us
To see oursel's as others see us!"

The experience would do you a world of good, Jim....

snip

73 de Jim, N2EY

73, Leo