Thread
:
Stirrings in the veldt
View Single Post
#
27
March 5th 04, 11:23 PM
William
Posts: n/a
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message om...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
Because, BRAIN, it's not about how I address YOU...
I say it is. Until you behave yourself, its TAFKARJ!!!
Then I'd say you've pretty well proven that I am right about your
general lack of character.
About what I'd expect from someone who expresses public
admiration for a known liar and antagonist.
It's about
why do YOU address Jim Miccolis with belittling endearments when
HE has never addressed YOU as anything except your proper name?
Tuff. I'm holding TAFKARJ metaphorically hostage until you straighten
your insane a$$ out. My regrets to Jim. I'll send out for
Schlottskey's deli.
Still haven't answered the question, which in itself I'd say puts
you in the "coward" category, but the INSISTENCE on being insulting
where no insult was offered puts you solidly in the "scumbag"
category, too.
Do you often get involved with other people's issues?
Only when I see creepy scumbags acting like bullies towards
people who have treated them with nothing but respect.
You'd be that bully, ergo you'd be that scumbag.
I am sure you family line is proud of you.
He can. He has. And to a reasonable person, effectively. But
TAFKARJ remains in another world. A Ham in a Bubble.
So far everything he's said, other than that that he clearly
states as opinion, is true.
You and Lennie the Liar do not have that reputation.
Are YOU that weak minded and foolish?
Don't know.
I do....
On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most weak-minded and foolish,
how high would you rate me?
Ummmm.... a solid 8.5. You ahve the potential to be redeemed,
but I doubt it. You occassionally manage to express a vaild opinion
without being insulting or dememaning, but your inability to
substantiate your claims leaves you wanting pretty badly.
He did the same thing with me when he launched into allegations
of being a "jack booted thug", "Nazi", "elitist", "Dill Sergeant", etc
etc etc, when I had not so addressed him. He is treated and addressed
in the same tone and with the same viciousness as he unleashed.
Ahem. I hate to be the one to break it to you, Steve, but you are
just a wee little bit over the top. Ask ANYone!
Perhaps I am...But I refuse to be talked down to, pushed, or
otherwise be bullied by cowards and creeps like you and Lennie.
Sorry if that hurts your feelings. Perhaps asking yourself how
you came to this juncture would be warranted?
Is that how you feel? Do YOU need to belittle Jim in order
to effectively express yourself when discussing things with/about him?
Do you need to belittle me in order to express yourself?
Nope. You belittle yourself just fine. But since you deem it
necessary to address people the way you do, I just assume that this is
the manner in which you find it most effective to communicate.
Rhetorical question. I already know the answer.
No you don't. You ASSUME that you know an answer.
And, no, I don't need to belittle TAFKARJ. Have I done so?
THAT was a rhetorical question, Brain.
Please do not humiliate yourself by trying to misdirect this
question by asking ME about how I address Lennie...I've already
answered that.
See above. Why do you need to try to belittle ME?
Because it seems to be the form of communication that you
understand.
Stay focused...you were asked a direct, specific question.
Which was?
Which was obviously not important enough for you to answer like a
man.
You CAN answer direct, specific questions, can't you?
If I can recall them.
Obviously you ARE Gene Pool Deficient...
Cut and snip to...
PS: I will assume any answer to the question that attempts to
redirect or obfuscate the response to be "I am unwilling to directly
answer the question as I know the truth to be other than what I
stated". Simple enough?
See above. Questions answered. Now what?
No, they weren't...but I am sure that you think that you danced
your way around the point.
THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable
character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who
publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and
antagonist.
Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to
publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that.
Steve, K4YZ
Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really
believe what you say.
But I don't.
I think you're nuts.
Reply With Quote