View Single Post
  #21   Report Post  
Old March 11th 04, 04:20 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N2EY wrote:
In article , Alun
writes:


That's one possibility. Another is bankruptcy and the resulting
defaults on student and other loans.


The problem with that is that I don't think you can write off student loans
through bankruptcy.



I'm not sure if you can or cannot. Anybody know for sure?



Yes and no:

from

http://www.mdbankruptcylaw.com/lawgu...u_cant_pay.asp


Another possible solution is to discharge your student loan in
bankruptcy. However, due to a 1998 change in the bankruptcy law, this is
harder than ever to do. In general, you can discharge a student loan in
bankruptcy only if you can prove that repaying the loan would be a
severe hardship for you. There are several factors that courts consider
in making this determination, but suffice it to say, it's a very
difficult standard to meet.


At one time, many students simply completed their education, and as a
matter of course, declared bankruptcy and wiped out their debts (HA!
America's best and brightest, eh?) After it caught on that they were
doing this, the law was changed.

So a person that declares bankruptcy has to continue repayment unless
they can prove they simply can't pay. And that isn't all that likely to
happen.



So, you may not get graduates going intentionally
bankrupt, but the inability to pay it off may lead more people into
bankruptcy. They may then still owe the loan, but it won't get paid back.



Either way spells trouble.


Makes me think of the "They Might be Giants" Sone "Minimum Wage"


Here's one data point:

In the fall of 1972, when I entered the University of Pennsylvania,
tuition alone (no books, fees, etc.) was $3000/year. Which was very
expensive at the time. Today the same school charges more than 10
times that. But will the starting salary offered to a BSEE in 2006 be
more than 10 times what it was in 1976, when I graduated? Is
fininacial aid 10 times what it was in my time there? Nope.

Add to this the fact that a kid who worked at minimum wage during the
weekends,
summer and holidays could make a sizable dent in that $3000/year
tuition. If a
kid could take home $1.50 an hour, and manage to put in 1000 hours per
year, there's half the tuition. Today, if a kid can take home $5 an
hour and put in the same 1000 hours, the resulting $5000 is only about
1/6 of the tuition.

That's just not right.


No argument there. Back home in the UK they used to give everyone grants.
They were means tested, and of course if your parents were middle income
you would be the poorest student in college.



Still, the effective result was that almost any kid who was smart enough to get
in could go to college and get a degree. The rich ones paid their way and the
rest got various forms of help but did not have to start out their professional
lives way in debt.


However, now they are phasing
out grants and bringing in loans. This is also a big mistake.



Actually, I think loans make sense *IF* they are reasonable and the job
situation is such that they can be paid back in a short period of time.


The loans and their repayment are pretty reasonable.

The big question nobody wants to answer is "why does a year of college cost so
much?"


You actually do know, don't you?



- Mike KB3EIA -