RadioBanter - View Single Post

March 14th 04, 06:36 PM

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,
(William) writes:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test
issue"...Leonard H Anderson.

Yeah...right...

Since his claim has been proven to be false so many times, Steve, why do
you
bother with him?

73 de Jim, N2EY

TAFKARJ, my theory is that he can't help himmself. He is obsessed with
Len.

There's more to that than is apparent on the surface.

The PCTAs all use misdirection via questions or "challenges" on other
subjects in order to divert the thread away from the morse code test
issue.

Talk about obsessed.

No, the subject is the morse code test. It is not about Control by
PCTA or the incessant name-calling done by yourself.

The Morse Code test issue is being respolved in Washington and
Gettysburg via the NPRM process.

Absolutely incorrect.

As of this date there is NO new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) concerning Part 97, Title 47 C.F.R.

So far there have only been 14 PETITIONS given a docket and
shown to the public with comments invited.

There is a PROPOSED petition by the ARRL which, so far, is only
seen by the public on the ARRL website. The FCC has not given
it a docket number nor shown it on its website.

"Gettysburg?" Someone gave you the wrong Gettysburg Address.

All indicators are that it will be
deleted, or at least reserved for the highest class (and greatest
breadth of priviledges...Mostly in parts of the spectrum where only
Morse Code can be sued anyway...).

Are you going to "sue" the government to make morse code testing
there forever and ever?

There are NO "all indicators." You are imagining the FCC and ARRL
are one and the same insofar as regulations are concerned.

The ARRL supposed "petition" remains on their website. It is NOT
a petition with invitation for public commentary from the FCC.

ARRL does NOT make amateur radio regulations. It only implies
it does.

ARRL still has membership LESS than a quarter of all licensed U.S.
radio amateurs. ARRL is therefore a MINORITY special-interest
group.

There's no "misdirection", Yuor Scumminess.

YES there is. Your posting is an example. Total IGNORANT
rambling trying to "draw fire" (so to speak) coupled with both
name-calling and rage-induced typing mistakes ("Yuor").

If you had any sincerity about discussing any subject matter (you
obviously don't, only want to fight), then you would have identified
the difference in FCC docket subjects and what they mean.

You obviously don't know them.

The FCC has made definitions of NPRMs, NOIs, (petitions for) RMs
available to the public long before the Internet was formed, before
the Internet went public access.

You should, but obviously don't even after a long licensed period,
at least acquaint yourself (if you can't learn) with the rule-making
process AND who is in charge of amateur radio regulations.

Hint: ARRL is NOT in charge, never was.

And if you'd ANSWER some of the questions, they MIGHT go away, IF
you have a valid answer for them..."I don't HAVE to answer and you
can't make me" is pretty sophmoric...nothing less that we expect from
you and PuppetBoy, however.

You are NOT the moderator in here.

You are NOT some kind of "official" in this newsgroup who can demand
answers.

You are NOT any sort of "NCO" Dill Instructor and this is NOT the
corps.

You are NOT anything but a poor deluded and ignorant petty person
trying to control others by insults, innuendo, and ignorant ramblings
of suppositions from an obviously NOT-insider.

Stop trying to impose your own personal fantasy on others. You
can NOT transform reality to suit yourself...try to suit yourself to
the reality. Accomplish that and you've made yourself acceptible
to others.

Right now you are NOT acceptible.

LHA / WMD