In article , Steve Stone
writes:

For those who lost my original post:

http://www.tr.com/online/trd/2004/td....htm#TopOfPage

The original post was copied from a Yahoo group.

That is from Aspen Publishers who have nice, expensive, and (in this
case) questionable accuracy. They have very expensive tele-
communications law reports and text books. The above link is
from their Telecommunications Reports section.

The last paragraph of the Reports item mentioned is incorrect. There
is a 30-day from FR publishing for COMMENTS; there is a 45-day
from FR publishing for REPLIES TO COMMENTS.

ALL of the Comments and Replies to Comments on a docket are
indicated on the FCC ECFS. That's free. No one has to pay
thousands of dollars to subscribe to some publisher's "reports" to
get information.

As of Noon EST on 18 Mar 04, there were still only 24 Comments
on Docket 04-37, the first Comment filed on 19 Feb 04. There are
still only 5 Comments on Docket 04-29. Hardly any "flood" of
input from "enthusiasts coming out swinging" on anything. The
Public Notice about the Access BPL NPRM has been in public
view since 12 Feb 04, a bit over a month ago.

Can you find a Yahoo or any other place that explains the use of
TWO docket numbers for the SAME NPRM?

LHA / WMD