Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


I have, and are you talking about something else? I took NECVEC to be a


typo, since NCVEC is a group that put forth a proposal some time ago.
Perhaps you are referring to a different group?

At any rate, No need to modify my argument if you are referring to the
NCVEC and not the NECVEC.


My apologies, most noble of high rank amateurdom.

No need to apologize, Len. Thanks for the clarification.

- Mike KB3EIA -