RadioBanter - View Single Post - Why Can't N-ZERO-IMD Validate His Own Claims...?!?!

March 21st 04, 11:29 PM

In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article , "Jim Hampton"
writes:

Hello, Steve

I think I have figured out the real problem behind most of the flames both
in this group and rec.radio.cb. I might be wrong, but it appears everyone
is trying to defend that their particular turf is "important" and someone
else's is not.

...more likely just defending their own pesonna, but why spoil your
nice rant?

Now Lennie get's to tell us how Jim's comments, otehr than not
being approved by him, are a "rant"...

Fast-forward to today. Cell phones are likely the primary means of
reporting those accidents. Who needs the hams? Some hams will say "who
needs cb?"

A lot of folks state that amateur radio isn't a service; it's just a
hobby.

Amateurs are all there to SERVE as "emergency minutemen!"

Right.

Lennie the Loser is trying to argue a point Jim's making that
actually echoes some of HIS sentiments...

How perculiar.

Perambulate your personal perspective, but don't pester us
particularly with poorly percolated petty pesterings promoted as
a perspicatious presentation when it is really perseverance of
persiflage. Ptui.

"Perculiar" indeed. :-)

Few take into account how fragile that infrastructure of cell phones,
telephones, and internet can be when a large area is affected.

Riiight...on 11 Sep 01 the entire borough of Manhattan went down
after the Attack on the WTC towers...?

Ham radio was Johnny-on-the-spot immediately notifying all?

Lennie...Jim said "the infrastructure is ftagile".

It's already been proven as just that.

Can YOU "prove" otherwise, other than making snide or insinuating
personal swipes at the folks commementing here...!??!

I already have, re the 11 Sep 01 Attack on America, in specific the
partial destruction of both the Manhattan Emergency Communication
Center and part of the telephone trunk lines adjacent to the WTC
towers. Regardless, the entire telephone system (cellular telephone
included) of the borough of Manhattan was NOT shut down.

At the Pentagon in Washington, DC, the third hijacked aircraft crash
did not disrupt any cellular telephone system in DC. The crash did
inflict great damage to one-fifth of the Pentagon along with much
loss of life, but the architecture of the Pentagon is low relative to the
WTC towers and personal escape routes are much shorter for near-
crash-site inhabitants. The Pentagon's internal fire and damage
control network (installed the year before) worked well from a planned
alternate control point to shut off utilities and thus restrain any further
spread of fire damage. Such a system was not possible in the WTC
towers when the entire structure was put at overstress.

All of the above information has been widely published in the popular
press. So too are general informations about the telephone infra-
structure with associated cellular telephone service -

Telephone circuits for conventional subscription service route through
switch centers. Switch centers permit a subscriber to "dial" direct
to any other telephone; several centers are involved in "dialings" out-
side of area codes or to other countries. Switching is limited by
economic factors to a fraction of the maximum possible subscriber
base, somewhere just less than ten percent for older, obsolete
electromechanical switching; maximum may be larger in ESS or
Electronic Switching System central offices. Ergo, all subscribers
cannot be on-line at the same time; switch centers refuse to accept
off-hook (handset lifted or cell phone On/Talk) subscribers on
exceedance of maximum numbers. Reaching exceedance of
maximums does not cause an ESS to fail; normal operation returns
automatically when fewer subscribers access the system. Telephone
central offices have had emergency electrical power facilities since
before WW2 in the USA; such emergency power is not limitless in
operating time and is, like switch traffic capacity, governed by
economics in normal operation.

In the old "Bell System" monopoly (a most generous one despite the
complaints and government actions for so long), the technical
excellence and robustness of the U.S. telephone infrastructure was
exceptional - and known worldwide. Cellular sites for the cellular
telephone service are themselves small extensions of each central
office complex. Running (usually) unattended, they also have
emergency electrical power backup. Again, like the central office,
such emergency electrical power capacity and life is limited by
economic factors of normal use. As Phil Kane pointed out, the
deregulation of the U.S. telephone system resulted in several local
telephone companies downgrading capacity and service of certain
types of emergency power, particularly at cell sites. Cellular
telephone service arrived after the big telephone deregulation so
there is no example of comparison as to what it might have been
had the old Bell System remained a virtual monopoly.

NO structure is immune to physical damage whether from fire or
ice-accumulation or collision. That includes both governmental
structures as well as individual amateur radio station locations.
In general, the government structures are designed to be more
robust than residences so, on the whole, they can withstand more
environmental abuse. In the old Bell System, most equipment,
including overhead cables was designed, made, and installed for
a minimum working life of two decades. Some things for longer.
Such telephone life expectancy has been proven in-use several
times over. This does not apply to subscriber terminal equipment
which can be (optionally after deregulation) of consumer
electronics quality. However, the state of the art of solid-state
electronic devices has increased the mean time between failure
rates of complex consumer electronics devices...it is no longer
possible to judge electronics devices' life merely by physical
appearance to the naked eye.

Cell sites service areas are located and designed to overlap
adjacent cells. The amount of overlap depends on decisions in
intial location plus uncontrollable changes in structures and,
sometimes, rarely, in earth moving within a service area.
Cellular service is not guaranteed to be perfect as in wireline
telephony but it is quite good considering the frequency (1 GHz)
and quite low power of a cell handset. Those handsets are
basically little two-way radios. Just the same, their usefulness
in normal life has been proven to the extent that more than
100 million cellular service subscriptions had been taken out
by users in 2003 according to the Census Bureau's interim
report of early 2004. That is approximately one cell phone per
every three citizens.

Depending on a particular telephone company, cell sites can
be arranged to automatically change over to link with a different
central office or to connect with their main through microwave
radio relay (some are linked only by microwave). There is no
set rule on that and it is dependent on the local telephone
company. As it is, they are quite reliable, almost to the extent
of the wireline POTS (Plain Old Telephone System). Reliability
of cell handsets is left up to individual subscribers.

All in all, the amazing growth of cellular telephony in the last
quarter century is phenomenal, especially considering the
operating frequency (low L-Band) and the cost reduction,
typically below that of an amateur average HT. It is not a
perfect solution to emergency communications but it is used
daily throughout the USA for many and varied small
emergencies. To discount it or sneer at its usefulness is folly.

Was anyone knocking the state of New York? (or New Yourk?)

I don't think so.

You have. You've "knocked" everything west of the Owens Valley.

No. I've tried to point out that the population of the United States
also exists in the western states. The center of population has
been steadily moving westward since 1790 (then somewhere in
Maryland) and in 1990 was located 9.7 miles NW of Steelville,
Missouri (source: U.S. Census Bureau). That point is west of the
Mississippi river.

I tend to promote California, yes, for several reasons: It is the
most populous state of the Union as well as being in the top 10
for land area (size is 9/10ths that of Sweden and full auto trip
north-south takes two 7-hour driving days to complete); this
state has an operating budget larger than many foreign
countries and is dynamic in commerce and trade as the main
U.S. gateway to Asia for that; the major aircraft and solid-state
electronics corporations started here and most prospered (see
Lockheed, North American, Ryan, Douglas, Vultee, Northrup
complexes here plus the "Silicon Valley" and Hewlett-Packard
and Intel for electronics).

You wouldn't help your wife by passing in a roll of toilet paper,
Lennie.

Putz.

Is being insulting, rude, obnoxious, and resorting to toilet humor
considerd "civil amateur behavior?" Certainly not, yet you seem
to do nothing else in here.

LHA / WMD