Alun wrote:

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in
y.com:


"N2EY" wrote in message
...


RM-10867 - ARRL, 18 March 2004

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r..._pdf=pdf&id_do
cum ent=6516083735




RM-10870 - NCVEC, 3 March 2004

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r..._pdf=pdf&id_do
cum ent=6516082208



RM-10868 - AG4RQ, 18 March 2004

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/r..._pdf=pdf&id_do
cum ent=6515783299


73 de Jim, N2EY

How many petitions does that make altogether. Don't these people
realize that the plethora of petitions will drag out the process? It
demonstrates a lack of consensus in the ham community, which could
cause the FCC to do exactly nothing.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE




That's probably what some of the old guard are trying to do. They are most
likely filing spurious petitions to delay the inevitable.

Bad form, Alun. One petition I have seen is of the "old guard type".
The others are eliminating Morse code testing (or keeping it for the
highest class, making the testing regimen easier. Seems like most of
them are along the lines of what you want, not the old guard.

- Mike KB3EIA -