Subject: Why Can't N-ZERO-IMD Validate His Own Claims...?!?!
From: (William)
Date: 3/27/2004 9:46 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

JJ wrote in message
...
Wee Willie Winky wrote:
JJ wrote in message
...


There now you go, upsetting all the anti-ham crowd who can't manage to
get a license,


Brave words from a guy w/o a license.

Sorry to dissappoint you willieboy, but I have an advanced. Took my exam
in front of an FCC examiner.

Sorry to disappoint you, JJ, but in the absence of a verifiable call
sign your claims just cannot be believed.

The rule around here is "proof." The alternative to proof is called
"lying."

Not my rules, but that's how this is played. Best of Luck.

There's no "rules" here, Brain.

You simply made an assertion which was, on the face of it, false.

It was obvious to anyone who is actually INVOLVED in ANY aspect of
"emergency comms", but since you've made a point of trying to claim you DIDN'T
say it when in fact you did, well, I justr could't pass up the opportunity to
rub your nose in it.

The end result is that you've stretched out a personally embarrassing
whomping that you could have ended almost as soon as you started it by just
adding "in my opinion",.

Of course you could have provided us some sort of reference that actually
validated your assertion, but you and I both know that THAT wasn't possible.

So...here we are, two weeks later, and you've made a complete and utter
fool of yourself trying to squeeze out from under the rock that you got
yourself under.

And for what?

Steve, K4YZ