Thread
:
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions
View Single Post
#
11
March 27th 04, 04:58 PM
N2EY
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
The Dick Bash printing organization was a late-comer among
the general "Q&A" publishing group (never a large one).
Bash obtained the material in his books by methods that were unethical and
arguably illegal at the time.
The
surname has emotional connotations handy for those who
need to have something, anyone to "bash" due to whatever
frustration those people have.
Bash obtained the material in his books by methods that were unethical and
arguably illegal at the time.
Bash's actions were the equivalent of sneaking into a teacher's office and
copying tests before they were given, then selling the copies.
Oddly, no one seems to bash
the ARRL for publishing essentially the same sort of material
long before the Bash company did its thing.
That's because ARRL obtained its material through proper channels. FCC
published a study guide of questions that indicated the mateiral that would be
on the tests (but not the actual Q&A), and ARRL reprinted it, along with other
information useful to someone seeking an amateur radio license. All with FCC
knowledge and approval. In fact, the License Manuals explain the source of the
study guides.
Bash obtained his materials by other methods, and his books did not explain how
the material was obtained.
In a way, buying a Bash book was akin to receiving stolen property.
Reply With Quote