Thread
:
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions
View Single Post
#
11
March 30th 04, 01:58 AM
N2EY
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
In article ,
(N2EY) writes:
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
The Dick Bash printing organization was a late-comer among
the general "Q&A" publishing group (never a large one).
Bash obtained the material in his books by methods that were unethical and
arguably illegal at the time.
So did the Q&A book folks.
How did the "Q&A book folks" gather their information?
By all the time-honored practices used in college and
university written exam "cheat sheets" well before there
were any radio regulating agencies.
How do you know this?
I never saw any "cheat sheets" in my undergraduate or graduate schools. Not
one, in any subject. You obviously have far more experience with that sort of
thing than I.
Stop trolling for an argument subject.
I'm simply asking questions, Len. You're doing all the arguing, name calling,
etc.
The practice is well known in many activities.
Not to me. I've never even seen a "Bash book", nor any form of professional
study guide derived by methods such as Bash used.
It has been explained
by others in here.
You seem very familiar with the process.
Dick Bash was a late-comer in the
FCC examination "typical test question-answer" area
in the USA. Many others were ahead of his company.
Such as?
You waste our time, my time, everyone's time.
How? All I did was ask some questions. You don't have to answer them. But for
some reason you are compelled to argue with anyone who does not agree with
everything you post.
Reply With Quote
