View Single Post
  #122   Report Post  
Old April 1st 04, 09:43 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(William) writes:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...
In article ,


(Len Over 21) writes:

In article ,


(N2EY) writes:

The FCC was informed of the use of Farnsworth-spaced Morse Code, and of
other
standard practices of the VE teams. FCC took no exceptions, and there

were
no
dissenting opinions in the FCC or the VE teams. Therefore, the use of
Farnsworth spaced Morse Code had a legal basis.

AFTER the fact.


So what?


So all those years that it was in use WITHOUT a legal basis, that's
what.

VEs had used Farnsworth spacing BEFORE it was acknowledged
by the Commission.


How do you know?


Why don't you know?

In addition, anyone who prefers non-Farnsworth-spaced Morse Code for

their
test need merely request it and the VE team will provide it.

Regardless of that, the Farnsworth spacing was used BEFORE it
had any legal basis.


How do you know that FCC was not contacted by the VECs? How do you know

what
method of code testing was used by FCC when they gave the tests?


If the FCC is going to require an exam for licensure, shouldn't the
public know what the requirements are?

Those who understand how Morse Code works have no problem with the use
of

Farnsworth spacing.

Regardless of that, the Farnsworth spacing was used BEFORE it
had any legal basis.

Do you have any proof of that claim?

I didn't think so.


We've been through this before.


Jimmy likes to go over and over and over and over old subjects.
Maybe he figures he might win one of them during reruns... :-)

LHA / WMD