Thread
:
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions
View Single Post
#
133
April 3rd 04, 04:28 PM
Steve Robeson K4CAP
Posts: n/a
Subject: Wrong Yet Again, Len!
From:
(William)
Date: 4/2/2004 7:50 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
"William" wrote in message
om...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
"William" wrote in message
om...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
Naturally. Farnsworth spaced code for slow word speeds is much
easier
to
copy than using slow letters.
Unnaturally. If the person prepared for Morse Code as stated in the
regulation, the Farnsworth Code will zip by. Failure is predictable.
No current study materials omit explaining to the student that the
Farnsworth spacing will be used in the test. Anyone who ignores that
information has set themselves up for failure.
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
The ARRL used Farnsworth for years before publishing a notice that
they were doing so.
Sorry but it was published.
Years later.
Brain, you have yet to answer my question as to WHAT FCC or federal law
mandated any "declaration" about using Farnsworth methodology for code test
preparation.
You DO have an answer, don't you?
I've read Part 97 a couple times and find nothing there that mandates it.
And I am also awaiting your answer as to WHAT "specification" exists for
"Morse Code".
More assertions without validation? Or is it OPINION, expressed just
because you like to see your name in print...?!?!
Steve, K4YZ
Reply With Quote