Subject: Wrong Yet Again, Len!
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 4/3/2004 1:28 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
In article ,
(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:
Brain, you have yet to answer my question as to WHAT FCC or federal law
mandated any "declaration" about using Farnsworth methodology for code test
preparation.
Brian did not bring this "declaration" up...that was another.
Not int eh current course of exchanges, it asn't.
You are free to find your own sources of offical statements at the FCC
website using their own, publicly-available search facilities.
You DO have an answer, don't you?
You CAN do your own searches, but contentiousness is so much
easier to do, a sort of instant satsifaction of personal irritation.
Sure I can.
But in these changes, Brain was making the assertion.
Or was that your hand up his backside making his mouth work again, Lennie?
I've read Part 97 a couple times and find nothing there that mandates
it.
And I am also awaiting your answer as to WHAT "specification" exists
for
"Morse Code".
97.3 (a) (27) - CCITT Recommendation F.1 (1984), Division B,
I. Morse code.
That is as stated in the 1 October 2003 printed form of Title 47 C.F.R.
available from the Government Printing Office. That same definition
existed in the October 2005 Code of Federal Regulations.
October 2005?
What happened to 1984 when VE testing began?
There are several adult education courses available in your area to
improve your personal reading comprehension skills.
But why?
I read quite well, Lennie.
Well enough, in fact, ot ahve caught you and your surrogate in a number of
"newsgroup faux pas"
More assertions without validation? Or is it OPINION, expressed just
because you like to see your name in print...?!?!
You have been repeatedly informed of the existing regulatory
specifications of and about International Morse Code. For years.
But still you refuse to specifically cite it.
I have yet to see a single "specification" that dictates character
duration or spacing.
There is no point in you trying to argue the same subject with
constant obvious contentious behavior and trying to promote
verbal battles that irritate others.
If one does not want to be irritated, Lennie, then perhaps thye shouldn't
be making dumb assertions they can't validate.
It is much better to concentrate personal efforts on very real,
serious problems facing your remaining "service" days, such as
Access BPL and a possible future regulatory restructuring of
amateur radio.
I dare say my "personal efforts" in Amateur Radio far outstrip the
comments you've ever posted to EFCS, Lennie.
Steve, K4YZ