RadioBanter - View Single Post

April 26th 04, 11:24 PM

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Cell phone woes
From: (William)
Date: 4/25/2004 10:17 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...

But right now...today...what I stated is true.

Nope, you're "FACTS" are moving targets. You've already backtracked
on your original statement and now say that 1% of MARS personnel are
not Amateurs.

OK...here we go again.

No, Steve. There YOU go again.

Brian, I have ALWAYS stated that there are SOME "non-Amateur" personnel
involved in MARS.

You absolutely have NOT.

This is what you stated: " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio".
"

Must I define " IS " for you?

Not only aren't all MARS personnel not amateur radio operators, but
MARS is NOT Amateur Radio.

Most of those are Active Duty Armed Forces.

And so you start modifying your position.

At first, " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio". "

Then, you allowed for active duty personnel.

You provided
the name of ONE person who is neither Amateur nor ADAF.

It only takes ONE to make your equation false.

I will accept that
there are probably folks who fall into that same category for N/MC and Army
MARS.

It matters not that you accept it. As a matter of fact, the more you
modify your nonsense statement that " Sorry Hans, MARS IS
"Amateur Radio". ," the closer you come to the truth.

I still contend that the numbers will be around 1%, certainly no more
than 10%.

Yet another modification. Congrats.

That means 90% of the load is carried by licensed Amateur Radio operators.

If you say so. I'm losing interest.

Let me know when you accept that your statement was false.